PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVUS vs. VONV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVUS vs. VONV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GVUS having a 20.44% return and VONV slightly higher at 20.63%.


GVUS

1D
0.40%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.29%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.48%

VONV

1D
0.38%
1M
2.02%
6M
15.40%
YTD
20.63%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
11.68%
ALL TIME*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.81M$1.84M$668.69K
$67.85M$88.58M$94.83M

GVUS vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
20.44%15.90%14.08%5.51%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
20.63%15.81%14.28%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and VONV is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.99

The correlation between GVUS and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVUS vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVUS
VONV

Technology

19.6%
19.9%

Financial Services

19.3%
18.6%

Healthcare

12.6%
12.7%

Industrials

10.3%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
7.5%

Energy

6.1%
5.5%

Utilities

3.9%
3.9%

Real Estate

3.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.3%

Technology

GVUS
19.6%
VONV
19.9%

Financial Services

GVUS
19.3%
VONV
18.6%

Healthcare

GVUS
12.6%
VONV
12.7%

Industrials

GVUS
10.3%
VONV
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GVUS
10.2%
VONV
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

GVUS
7.3%
VONV
7.5%

Energy

GVUS
6.1%
VONV
5.5%

Utilities

GVUS
3.9%
VONV
3.9%

Real Estate

GVUS
3.8%
VONV
3.8%

Basic Materials

GVUS
3.5%
VONV
3.4%

Communication Services

GVUS
3.2%
VONV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVUS vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVUS
GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVUS vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVUSVONVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

4.58

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.95

19.65

+0.30

GVUS vs. VONV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the VONV Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and VONV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum VONV drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and VONV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVUSVONVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-38.21%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

-6.81%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.07%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-3.87%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.59%

-0.03%

Volatility

GVUS vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVUSVONVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.84%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

8.67%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

11.40%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

14.77%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

17.20%

-3.99%

GVUS vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GVUS vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than VONV's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
1.49%1.77%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.56%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GVUS and VONV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GVUS has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to VONV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs VONV's -38.21%.

On 1-year performance, VONV leads with 32.99% vs 32.63% for GVUS. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VONV has performed better with a 32.99% return vs 32.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.49% for GVUS.

GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.06% for VONV.

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVUS and VONV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer