GVUS vs. VONV
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - GVUS tracks the Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VONV tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 28.35% for VONV. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONV.
Performance
GVUS vs. VONV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GVUS having a 14.24% return and VONV slightly higher at 14.28%.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
GVUS vs. VONV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | 14.08% | 5.51% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 14.28% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and VONV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GVUS and VONV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GVUS vs. VONV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GVUS
VONV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GVUS
VONV
Technology
GVUS
VONV
Industrials
GVUS
VONV
Healthcare
GVUS
VONV
Communication Services
GVUS
VONV
Consumer Cyclical
GVUS
VONV
Consumer Defensive
GVUS
VONV
Energy
GVUS
VONV
Utilities
GVUS
VONV
Real Estate
GVUS
VONV
Basic Materials
GVUS
VONV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. VONV — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
VONV
GVUS vs. VONV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 4.18 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 17.54 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 0.71 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. VONV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum VONV drawdown of -38.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and VONV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -38.21% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -6.81% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.91% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.62% | -0.02% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. VONV - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) have volatilities of 3.01% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | VONV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 2.94% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 8.09% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 10.81% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 14.77% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 17.24% | -3.96% |
GVUS vs. VONV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VONV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GVUS vs. VONV - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than VONV's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GVUS and VONV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs VONV's -38.21%.
On 1-year performance, VONV leads with 28.35% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VONV has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GVUS.
VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.
GVUS tracks Russell 1000 Value 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.06% for VONV.
VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and VONV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer