GSUS vs. SPYG
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 12.55%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
GSUS vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.49% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
GSUS vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 7.39% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.49% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 36.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and SPYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.95 |
The correlation between GSUS and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSUS
SPYG
Communication Services
GSUS
SPYG
Financial Services
GSUS
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
SPYG
Healthcare
GSUS
SPYG
Industrials
GSUS
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
SPYG
Energy
GSUS
SPYG
Utilities
GSUS
SPYG
Basic Materials
GSUS
SPYG
Real Estate
GSUS
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
SPYG
GSUS vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.81 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 7.15 | +2.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -67.63% | +42.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -13.76% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -22.14% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -32.67% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -5.71% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -24.28% | +19.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.48% | -1.36% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 5.03%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 7.26% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 13.85% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 17.22% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 21.36% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 20.72% | -3.63% |
GSUS vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.76% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GSUS and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to GSUS (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.06% vs 12.55% for GSUS. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 12.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for GSUS.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.04% for SPYG.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer