GSUS vs. GSLC
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Goldman Sachs - GSUS tracks the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index while GSLC tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.20%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for GSLC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.
Performance
GSUS vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 7.16% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 22.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
GSUS vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 9.54% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 7.16% | 16.17% | 24.21% | 25.09% | -18.71% | 27.17% | 32.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and GSLC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSUS and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. GSLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
GSLC
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSUS
GSLC
Communication Services
GSUS
GSLC
Financial Services
GSUS
GSLC
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
GSLC
Healthcare
GSUS
GSLC
Industrials
GSUS
GSLC
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
GSLC
Energy
GSUS
GSLC
Utilities
GSUS
GSLC
Basic Materials
GSUS
GSLC
Real Estate
GSUS
GSLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
GSLC
GSUS vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUS | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 2.34 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 10.16 | +2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum GSLC drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GSLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -33.69% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.49% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -18.66% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -24.90% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.89% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -4.38% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.18% | -0.08% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 4.43%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | GSLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.43% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.60% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.23% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 16.70% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.73% | -0.64% |
GSUS vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than GSLC's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.00% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.61% | 1.06% | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.69% | 0.36% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GSUS and GSLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSUS has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to GSLC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GSLC's -33.69%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.20% vs 12.17% for GSLC. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for GSLC.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.94% for GSLC.
GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GSLC tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.09% for GSLC.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and GSLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer