GSUS vs. GUSA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSUS returned 20.89%/yr vs 20.49%/yr for GUSA. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for GUSA.

Performance

GSUS vs. GUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than GUSA's 7.78% return.

GSUS

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 21.32%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: —

GUSA

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -1.32%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 21.42%
• 3Y*: 20.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. GUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF	7.39%	18.11%	25.25%	27.74%	-12.82%
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	7.78%	17.51%	24.46%	26.61%	-12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and GUSA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022	0.99

The correlation between GSUS and GUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. GUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GSUS	GUSA
Technology	39.3%	37.4%
Communication Services	11.1%	10.4%
Financial Services	10.8%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.6%
Industrials	7.5%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.3%
Energy	3.1%	3.2%
Utilities	2.0%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.0%

Return for Risk

GSUS vs. GUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS

GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GUSA

GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 57
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. GUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSUS	GUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.69	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.33	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	2.39	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	10.55	-0.47

GSUS vs. GUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the GUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and GUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. GUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than GUSA's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSUS	GUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.62%	-19.61%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.24%	-9.01%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	-19.61%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-3.37%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-4.35%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.03%	+0.09%

Volatility

GSUS vs. GUSA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) at 4.78%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSUS	GUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.03%	4.78%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	10.08%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	12.80%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	17.29%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	17.29%	-0.20%

GSUS vs. GUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSA's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GSUS vs. GUSA - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than GUSA's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF	0.76%	1.04%	1.19%	1.32%	1.51%	1.13%	0.78%
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	0.75%	0.99%	1.16%	1.36%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSUS and GUSA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GSUS and GUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GSUS or GUSA?

GSUS has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to GUSA (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GUSA's -19.61%.

Which ETF is better, GSUS or GUSA?

On 3-year performance, GSUS leads with 20.89% vs 20.49% for GUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GSUS or GUSA?

Over the 3-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 20.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GSUS or GUSA?

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for GUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GSUS or GUSA?

GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.75% for GUSA.

What is the main difference between GSUS and GUSA?

GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUSA is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.11% for GUSA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.