GSUS vs. GUSA
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GUSA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GSUS returned 22.74%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for GUSA. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for GUSA.
Performance
GSUS vs. GUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUS having a 10.67% return and GUSA slightly higher at 10.84%.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GUSA
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSUS vs. GUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 10.67% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -12.54% |
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 10.84% | 17.51% | 24.46% | 26.61% | -12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and GUSA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022 | 0.99 |
The correlation between GSUS and GUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. GUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
GUSA
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSUS
GUSA
Communication Services
GSUS
GUSA
Financial Services
GSUS
GUSA
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
GUSA
Healthcare
GSUS
GUSA
Industrials
GSUS
GUSA
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
GUSA
Energy
GSUS
GUSA
Utilities
GSUS
GUSA
Real Estate
GSUS
GUSA
Basic Materials
GSUS
GUSA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. GUSA — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
GUSA
GSUS vs. GUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSUS | GUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.09 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 14.20 | -0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUS | GUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.28 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.88 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. GUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than GUSA's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | GUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -19.61% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -9.01% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -19.61% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.62% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -4.39% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.95% | +0.08% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. GUSA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | GUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 3.09% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 9.29% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 12.21% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.27% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 17.27% | -0.21% |
GSUS vs. GUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSA's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. GUSA - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than GUSA's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% |
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GSUS and GUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GUSA has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GUSA's -19.61%.
On 3-year performance, GSUS leads with 22.74% vs 22.23% for GUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for GUSA.
GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for GUSA.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUSA is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.11% for GUSA.
GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and GUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer