PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSUS vs. GUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSUS vs. GUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GSUS having a 10.67% return and GUSA slightly higher at 10.84%.


GSUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.52%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*

GUSA

1D
-0.62%
1M
5.16%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.82%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
22.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSUS vs. GUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
10.67%18.11%25.25%27.74%-12.54%
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
10.84%17.51%24.46%26.61%-12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GSUS and GUSA is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2022

0.99

The correlation between GSUS and GUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

GSUS vs. GUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSUS
GUSA

Technology

35.6%
34.0%

Communication Services

11.9%
11.1%

Financial Services

11.7%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.8%

Industrials

8.0%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

GSUS
35.6%
GUSA
34.0%

Communication Services

GSUS
11.9%
GUSA
11.1%

Financial Services

GSUS
11.7%
GUSA
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GSUS
10.2%
GUSA
10.3%

Healthcare

GSUS
8.7%
GUSA
8.8%

Industrials

GSUS
8.0%
GUSA
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

GSUS
4.9%
GUSA
4.7%

Energy

GSUS
3.6%
GUSA
3.6%

Utilities

GSUS
2.2%
GUSA
2.3%

Real Estate

GSUS
1.7%
GUSA
2.2%

Basic Materials

GSUS
1.7%
GUSA
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSUS vs. GUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSUS
GSUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GSUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GSUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSA
GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSUS vs. GUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSUSGUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.09

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

14.20

-0.50

GSUS vs. GUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the GUSA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSUS and GUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSUSGUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.28

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.88

+0.24

Drawdowns

GSUS vs. GUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, which is greater than GUSA's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and GUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSUSGUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.62%

-19.61%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-9.01%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-19.61%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.62%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-4.39%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.95%

+0.08%

Volatility

GSUS vs. GUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is 2.91%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that GSUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSUSGUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.09%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

9.29%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

12.21%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

17.27%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.27%

-0.21%

GSUS vs. GUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSA's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSUS vs. GUSA - Dividend Comparison

GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than GUSA's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GSUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.04%1.19%1.32%1.51%1.13%0.78%
GUSA
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF
0.96%0.99%1.16%1.36%1.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GSUS and GUSA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GUSA has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to GSUS (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs GUSA's -19.61%.

On 3-year performance, GSUS leads with 22.74% vs 22.23% for GUSA. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GSUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 22.74% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for GUSA.

GSUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.96% for GUSA.

GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUSA is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while GUSA tracks Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.11% for GUSA.

GSUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSUS and GUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer