GSUS vs. SPTM
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPTM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.20%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
GSUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 10.17% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 15.51%
GSUS vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 9.54% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 10.17% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 34.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between GSUS and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
SPTM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSUS
SPTM
Communication Services
GSUS
SPTM
Financial Services
GSUS
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
SPTM
Healthcare
GSUS
SPTM
Industrials
GSUS
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
SPTM
Energy
GSUS
SPTM
Utilities
GSUS
SPTM
Basic Materials
GSUS
SPTM
Real Estate
GSUS
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
SPTM
GSUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 3.10 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 14.03 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -54.80% | +29.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -8.68% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -18.87% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -24.14% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.50% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -9.03% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.92% | +0.18% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 4.81% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 4.60% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.74% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.46% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 16.95% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 18.08% | -0.99% |
GSUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SPTM's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GSUS and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSUS has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to SPTM (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 5-year performance, GSUS leads with 13.20% vs 13.15% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSUS has performed better with a 13.20% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for GSUS.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.99% for GSUS.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPTM is Large Cap Blend Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer