GSUS vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
GSUS and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both GSUS and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSUS or SPTM.
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and SPTM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSUS vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSUS:
2.32
SPTM:
2.19
GSUS:
3.06
SPTM:
2.91
GSUS:
1.43
SPTM:
1.41
GSUS:
3.43
SPTM:
3.28
GSUS:
15.17
SPTM:
14.11
GSUS:
1.92%
SPTM:
1.94%
GSUS:
12.51%
SPTM:
12.50%
GSUS:
-25.62%
SPTM:
-54.80%
GSUS:
-0.94%
SPTM:
-1.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 28.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's 26.98% return.
GSUS
28.58%
1.35%
11.63%
29.05%
N/A
N/A
SPTM
26.98%
0.79%
11.08%
27.37%
14.71%
12.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSUS vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSUS vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSUS vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than SPTM's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.50% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.25% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSUS vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 4.01% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.