GSUS vs. FNDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX).
GSUS and FNDX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index. It was launched on May 12, 2020. FNDX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both GSUS and FNDX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSUS or FNDX.
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and FNDX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GSUS vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSUS:
2.26
FNDX:
1.90
GSUS:
2.99
FNDX:
2.63
GSUS:
1.42
FNDX:
1.35
GSUS:
3.33
FNDX:
3.29
GSUS:
14.80
FNDX:
11.53
GSUS:
1.91%
FNDX:
1.84%
GSUS:
12.48%
FNDX:
11.22%
GSUS:
-25.62%
FNDX:
-37.71%
GSUS:
-2.72%
FNDX:
-5.05%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 26.26% return, which is significantly higher than FNDX's 19.17% return.
GSUS
26.26%
0.49%
9.64%
26.96%
N/A
N/A
FNDX
19.17%
-2.37%
8.53%
20.12%
16.37%
14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSUS vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSUS vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSUS vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than FNDX's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.50% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.76% | 2.66% | 4.03% | 2.37% | 3.34% | 4.27% | 6.16% | 3.94% | 4.97% | 5.22% | 3.20% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and FNDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSUS vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.58%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.