GSUS vs. FNDX
GSUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSUS returned 13.20%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSUS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
GSUS vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUS achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.79% return.
GSUS
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
GSUS vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 9.54% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.74% | -19.82% | 27.13% | 34.82% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.79% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -6.92% | 31.73% | 36.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUS and FNDX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GSUS and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
GSUS vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSUS
FNDX
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
GSUS
FNDX
Communication Services
GSUS
FNDX
Financial Services
GSUS
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
GSUS
FNDX
Healthcare
GSUS
FNDX
Industrials
GSUS
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
GSUS
FNDX
Energy
GSUS
FNDX
Utilities
GSUS
FNDX
Basic Materials
GSUS
FNDX
Real Estate
GSUS
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUS vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
GSUS
FNDX
GSUS vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSUS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.56 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 5.27 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 20.40 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSUS vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUS drawdown since its inception was -25.62%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUS and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.62% | -37.72% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -6.06% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -16.30% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -19.06% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.02% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -3.55% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.56% | +0.54% |
Volatility
GSUS vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.29%. This indicates that GSUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUS | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 3.29% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 7.61% | +2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 10.47% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 15.18% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.52% | -0.43% |
GSUS vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSUS vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
GSUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
GSUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.04% | 1.19% | 1.32% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUS and FNDX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSUS has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to FNDX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSUS dropped -25.62% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 13.48% vs 13.20% for GSUS. On fees, GSUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 13.48% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.99% for GSUS.
GSUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. GSUS tracks Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GSUS and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSUS and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer