PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIE vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIE vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 20.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSIE having a 9.39% annualized return and HDV not far ahead at 9.50%.


GSIE

1D
0.46%
1M
1.03%
6M
5.39%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
9.39%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

HDV

1D
1.23%
1M
4.76%
6M
13.60%
YTD
20.12%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.98M$19.56M$19.60M
$163.75M$142.23M$95.79M

GSIE vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
8.75%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%26.22%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
20.12%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIE and HDV is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between GSIE and HDV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GSIE vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSIE
HDV

Financial Services

27.3%
4.7%

Industrials

18.6%
2.8%

Technology

10.6%
0.9%

Healthcare

9.6%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
24.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
0.8%

Energy

4.2%
19.8%

Communication Services

3.8%
5.2%

Utilities

3.3%
8.2%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

GSIE
27.3%
HDV
4.7%

Industrials

GSIE
18.6%
HDV
2.8%

Technology

GSIE
10.6%
HDV
0.9%

Healthcare

GSIE
9.6%
HDV
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GSIE
8.6%
HDV
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

GSIE
7.5%
HDV
24.3%

Basic Materials

GSIE
5.4%
HDV
0.8%

Energy

GSIE
4.2%
HDV
19.8%

Communication Services

GSIE
3.8%
HDV
5.2%

Utilities

GSIE
3.3%
HDV
8.2%

Real Estate

GSIE
1.2%
HDV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIE vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIE vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIEHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

4.65

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

12.72

-6.73

GSIE vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIE and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIE vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIEHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-37.04%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-5.18%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.07%

-10.49%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-15.42%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.63%

-37.04%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

0.00%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-3.07%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

1.89%

+0.95%

Volatility

GSIE vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is 3.56%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that GSIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIEHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

4.88%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.39%

8.55%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

10.74%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

12.93%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

15.77%

+0.72%

GSIE vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSIE vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.56%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.07%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIE and HDV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to GSIE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.50% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.56% for GSIE.

GSIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HDV is Dividend. GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.08% for HDV.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIE and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer