GSIE vs. HDV
GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GSIE returned 9.39%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for HDV. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GSIE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
GSIE vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIE achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 20.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GSIE having a 9.39% annualized return and HDV not far ahead at 9.50%.
GSIE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.80%
HDV
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.98M | $19.56M | $19.60M | |
| $163.75M | $142.23M | $95.79M |
GSIE vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 8.75% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | -15.86% | 13.27% | 7.45% | 22.83% | -13.40% | 26.22% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 20.12% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIE and HDV is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GSIE and HDV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GSIE vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSIE
HDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
GSIE
HDV
Industrials
GSIE
HDV
Technology
GSIE
HDV
Healthcare
GSIE
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
GSIE
HDV
Consumer Defensive
GSIE
HDV
Basic Materials
GSIE
HDV
Energy
GSIE
HDV
Communication Services
GSIE
HDV
Utilities
GSIE
HDV
Real Estate
GSIE
HDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSIE vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
GSIE
HDV
GSIE vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSIE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 4.65 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 12.72 | -6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSIE vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIE drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIE and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.63% | -37.04% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -5.18% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.07% | -10.49% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -15.42% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.63% | -37.04% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | 0.00% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -3.07% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 1.89% | +0.95% |
Volatility
GSIE vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) is 3.56%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that GSIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSIE | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.88% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 8.55% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 10.74% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 12.93% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 15.77% | +0.72% |
GSIE vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSIE vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
GSIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than HDV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSIE and HDV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to GSIE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIE dropped -34.63% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.50% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.56% for GSIE.
GSIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HDV is Dividend. GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSIE and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSIE and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer