GSEW vs. GTIP
GSEW (Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and GTIP (Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GSEW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while GTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSEW returned 8.39%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for GTIP. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSEW charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GTIP.
Performance
GSEW vs. GTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSEW achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than GTIP's 1.21% return.
GSEW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 16.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GTIP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GSEW vs. GTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 9.79% | 11.97% | 16.89% | 17.80% | -17.54% | 25.43% | 16.28% | 31.04% | -14.36% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 1.21% | 6.63% | 2.04% | 3.88% | -12.14% | 5.86% | 10.83% | 8.33% | 0.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSEW and GTIP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GSEW and GTIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSEW vs. GTIP — Risk / Return Rank
GSEW
GTIP
GSEW vs. GTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSEW | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.82 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 5.63 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSEW vs. GTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSEW drawdown since its inception was -38.65%, which is greater than GTIP's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSEW and GTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSEW | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.65% | -14.31% | -24.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.72% | -2.02% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.18% | -4.47% | -13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -14.31% | -11.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -0.65% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -4.21% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 0.65% | +1.38% |
Volatility
GSEW vs. GTIP - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) at 1.20%. This indicates that GSEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSEW | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 1.20% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 2.47% | +6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 3.37% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 6.05% | +10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 6.00% | +13.17% |
GSEW vs. GTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSEW has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GTIP's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSEW vs. GTIP - Dividend Comparison
GSEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than GTIP's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEW Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 1.06% | 1.52% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.74% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.66% | 1.56% | 0.54% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 4.71% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSEW and GTIP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSEW has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to GTIP (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSEW dropped -38.65% vs GTIP's -14.31%.
On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.39% vs 0.98% for GTIP. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GTIP has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 0.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GTIP.
GTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.06% for GSEW.
GSEW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GTIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while GTIP tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GSEW and 0.12% for GTIP.
GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GSEW and GTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer