GTIP vs. RINF
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF).
GTIP and RINF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. RINF is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both GTIP and RINF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GTIP or RINF.
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and RINF is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GTIP vs. RINF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GTIP:
1.57
RINF:
0.74
GTIP:
2.22
RINF:
1.06
GTIP:
1.28
RINF:
1.13
GTIP:
0.63
RINF:
0.70
GTIP:
4.38
RINF:
3.06
GTIP:
1.54%
RINF:
1.75%
GTIP:
4.30%
RINF:
7.27%
GTIP:
-14.31%
RINF:
-43.45%
GTIP:
-4.27%
RINF:
-2.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly higher than RINF's -0.64% return.
GTIP
3.37%
2.16%
1.91%
5.71%
1.83%
N/A
RINF
-0.64%
-1.45%
3.75%
5.32%
8.45%
3.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. RINF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RINF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GTIP vs. RINF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GTIP
RINF
GTIP vs. RINF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GTIP vs. RINF - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than RINF's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 3.42% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 4.71% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.83% | 1.91% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. RINF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum RINF drawdown of -43.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and RINF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GTIP vs. RINF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 1.29%, while ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.