GTIP vs. IUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB).
GTIP and IUSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both GTIP and IUSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GTIP or IUSB.
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and IUSB is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GTIP vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GTIP:
0.35
IUSB:
0.40
GTIP:
0.50
IUSB:
0.59
GTIP:
1.06
IUSB:
1.07
GTIP:
0.14
IUSB:
0.18
GTIP:
1.18
IUSB:
1.21
GTIP:
1.31%
IUSB:
1.71%
GTIP:
4.46%
IUSB:
5.22%
GTIP:
-14.31%
IUSB:
-17.98%
GTIP:
-7.63%
IUSB:
-7.27%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GTIP having a 1.78% return and IUSB slightly higher at 1.84%.
GTIP
1.78%
-0.98%
0.56%
1.74%
1.75%
N/A
IUSB
1.84%
-0.47%
1.40%
2.17%
-0.04%
1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GTIP vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GTIP vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than IUSB's 4.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 3.28% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 4.05% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and IUSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GTIP vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 1.16%, while iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.