PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTIP vs. FPEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTIP vs. FPEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTIP achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than FPEI's 1.66% return.


GTIP

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.48%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*

FPEI

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.66%
6M
2.14%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTIP vs. FPEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
1.78%6.63%2.04%3.88%-12.14%5.86%10.83%8.33%0.24%
FPEI
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF
1.66%9.82%10.94%6.29%-8.19%4.63%7.08%15.86%-3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GTIP and FPEI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTIP vs. FPEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTIP
GTIP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FPEI
FPEI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FPEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FPEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTIP vs. FPEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTIPFPEIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

2.45

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

3.90

-1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.57

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.48

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.57

12.37

-4.80

GTIP vs. FPEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FPEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTIP and FPEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTIPFPEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.45

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.72

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.57

-0.01

Drawdowns

GTIP vs. FPEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum FPEI drawdown of -27.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and FPEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTIPFPEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-27.51%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-3.63%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

-4.26%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

-16.46%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.05%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-3.06%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

0.73%

-0.09%

Volatility

GTIP vs. FPEI - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI) have volatilities of 0.99% and 0.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTIPFPEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.97%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.36%

3.06%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

3.69%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

5.97%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.01%

8.86%

-2.85%

GTIP vs. FPEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FPEI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTIP vs. FPEI - Dividend Comparison

GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than FPEI's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPEI
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.72%5.62%5.55%5.76%5.20%4.46%4.90%5.02%5.81%1.50%
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
4.68%4.58%3.52%2.77%6.47%3.82%1.04%2.34%0.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTIP and FPEI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTIP has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to FPEI (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTIP dropped -14.31% vs FPEI's -27.51%.

On 5-year performance, FPEI leads with 4.26% vs 1.20% for GTIP. On fees, GTIP is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FPEI has performed better with a 4.26% return vs 1.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GTIP is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPEI.

FPEI has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 4.68% for GTIP.

GTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while FPEI is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GTIP and 0.85% for FPEI.

FPEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTIP and FPEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer