GTIP vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
GTIP and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both GTIP and SCHP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GTIP or SCHP.
Key characteristics
| GTIP | SCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.18% | 3.10% |
| 1Y Return | 6.36% | 6.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.99% | -1.94% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.22% | 2.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.32 | 1.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.96 | 1.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.52 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.41 | 6.20 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.02% | 1.05% |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.95% | 5.06% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.31% | -14.26% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.36% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIP and SCHP is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GTIP vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTIP having a 3.18% return and SCHP slightly lower at 3.10%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTIP vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIP has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GTIP vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GTIP vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
GTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than SCHP's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 3.25% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 2.82% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
GTIP vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIP drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIP and SCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GTIP vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) is 1.10%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that GTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.