GLL vs. UCO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO).
GLL and UCO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). It was launched on Dec 1, 2008. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. Both GLL and UCO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GLL vs. UCO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLL vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold | -22.83% | -62.81% | -33.33% | -14.91% | -2.12% | 1.66% | -41.47% | -26.95% | 5.39% | -23.67% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 103.42% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLL achieves a -22.83% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 103.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GLL has underperformed UCO with an annualized return of -24.50%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively higher -9.17% annualized return.
GLL
- 1D
- -7.30%
- 1M
- 22.90%
- YTD
- -22.83%
- 6M
- -39.36%
- 1Y
- -60.18%
- 3Y*
- -42.72%
- 5Y*
- -32.85%
- 10Y*
- -24.50%
UCO
- 1D
- -8.13%
- 1M
- 53.88%
- YTD
- 103.42%
- 6M
- 74.82%
- 1Y
- 45.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- -9.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLL vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GLL and UCO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
GLL vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank
GLL
UCO
GLL vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | 0.80 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | 1.34 | -3.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.17 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 1.50 | -2.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 2.52 | -3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 0.80 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.93 | 0.39 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 | -0.13 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | -0.36 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLL and UCO is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GLL vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLL nor UCO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GLL vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLL drawdown since its inception was -99.24%, roughly equal to the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLL and UCO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.24% | -99.95% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.53% | -34.77% | -36.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.76% | -67.24% | -22.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.76% | -98.75% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.04% | -99.37% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.99% | -85.35% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.01% | 20.74% | +23.27% |
Volatility
GLL vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) is 21.53%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 24.72%. This indicates that GLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLL | UCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.53% | 24.72% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 40.37% | +6.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.76% | 57.29% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.40% | 59.14% | -23.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.98% | 71.30% | -39.32% |