PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCO vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCO vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCO vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
92.55%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%139.26%-92.91%53.83%-43.26%0.34%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
79.42%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 92.55% return, which is significantly higher than USO's 79.42% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has underperformed USO with an annualized return of -9.67%, while USO has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


UCO

1D
-5.34%
1M
34.20%
YTD
92.55%
6M
67.42%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
21.35%
10Y*
-9.67%

USO

1D
-2.48%
1M
42.32%
YTD
79.42%
6M
69.66%
1Y
60.99%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCO vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCO vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCO vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCOUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

1.56

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

2.22

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

2.97

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

5.14

-3.33

UCO vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCO and USO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCOUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.56

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.71

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

0.14

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

-0.19

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between UCO and USO is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UCO vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

Neither UCO nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UCO vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and USO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCOUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-98.19%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.77%

-20.39%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.24%

-36.23%

-31.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.75%

-86.75%

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.40%

-86.80%

-12.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.35%

-75.21%

-10.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.76%

11.77%

+8.99%

Volatility

UCO vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to United States Oil Fund LP (USO) at 22.21%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCOUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.64%

22.21%

+3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.74%

29.81%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.38%

39.35%

+18.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

34.40%

+24.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.31%

38.33%

+32.98%