UCO vs. BOIL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL).
UCO and BOIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. BOIL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas Subindex (200%). It was launched on Oct 4, 2011. Both UCO and BOIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UCO vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCO vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 103.42% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -29.61% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -67.70% | -20.55% | -65.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 103.42% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -29.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has outperformed BOIL with an annualized return of -9.17%, while BOIL has yielded a comparatively lower -55.56% annualized return.
UCO
- 1D
- -8.13%
- 1M
- 53.88%
- YTD
- 103.42%
- 6M
- 74.82%
- 1Y
- 45.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- -9.17%
BOIL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -29.61%
- 6M
- -46.25%
- 1Y
- -81.20%
- 3Y*
- -64.52%
- 5Y*
- -62.47%
- 10Y*
- -55.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCO vs. BOIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BOIL's 1.31% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCO vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank
UCO
BOIL
UCO vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | -0.68 | +1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | -1.00 | +2.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.88 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | -0.99 | +2.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | -1.33 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | -0.68 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | -0.53 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | -0.55 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | -0.61 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCO and BOIL is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UCO vs. BOIL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UCO nor BOIL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UCO vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and BOIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -100.00% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.77% | -81.53% | +46.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.24% | -99.88% | +32.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.75% | -99.98% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.37% | -100.00% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.35% | -93.51% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.74% | 60.91% | -40.17% |
Volatility
UCO vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) is 24.72%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 29.44%. This indicates that UCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCO | BOIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.72% | 29.44% | -4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.37% | 109.34% | -68.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.29% | 120.51% | -63.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.14% | 118.61% | -59.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.30% | 101.94% | -30.64% |