UCO vs. LABU
UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) and LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - UCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%), while LABU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCO returned 19.62%/yr vs -7.38%/yr for LABU. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for LABU.
Performance
UCO vs. LABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 84.21% return, which is significantly higher than LABU's 44.31% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has outperformed LABU with an annualized return of 19.62%, while LABU has yielded a comparatively lower -7.38% annualized return.
UCO
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -24.66%
- YTD
- 84.21%
- 6M
- 80.57%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
LABU
- 1D
- 11.19%
- 1M
- 31.29%
- YTD
- 44.31%
- 6M
- 30.68%
- 1Y
- 313.64%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- -30.40%
- 10Y*
- -7.38%
UCO vs. LABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 84.21% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | 77.27% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 44.31% | 79.17% | -26.02% | -13.41% | -80.36% | -64.15% | 74.66% | 75.50% | -57.61% | 149.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCO and LABU is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2015 | 0.11 |
The correlation between UCO and LABU shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCO vs. LABU — Risk / Return Rank
UCO
LABU
UCO vs. LABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCO | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.43 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 10.29 | -9.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 28.91 | -27.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCO vs. LABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, roughly equal to the maximum LABU drawdown of -99.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and LABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCO | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -99.18% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.96% | -30.70% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.38% | -78.30% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.24% | -97.59% | +30.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.50% | -98.96% | +2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.71% | -94.92% | +9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.11% | -81.71% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.90% | 10.91% | +7.99% |
Volatility
UCO vs. LABU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) is 16.18%, while Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a volatility of 29.77%. This indicates that UCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LABU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCO | LABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.18% | 29.77% | -13.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.09% | 63.11% | -15.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.66% | 78.92% | -21.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.09% | 95.94% | -35.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 317.79% | 95.55% | +222.24% |
UCO vs. LABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LABU's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCO vs. LABU - Dividend Comparison
UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares | 0.54% | 0.84% | 0.35% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.17% |
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCO and LABU have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LABU has higher volatility (29.77%) compared to UCO (16.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCO dropped -99.86% vs LABU's -99.18%.
On 10-year performance, UCO leads with 19.62% vs -7.38% for LABU. On fees, UCO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UCO has been the lower-risk option at 16.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCO has performed better with a 19.62% return vs -7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for LABU.
LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.
UCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while LABU is Leveraged Equities. UCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (200%), while LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCO and 1.12% for LABU.
LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCO and LABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer