PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UCO vs. OIH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


UCOOIH
YTD Return2.57%-3.67%
1Y Return-6.66%-3.88%
3Y Return (Ann)2.43%11.71%
5Y Return (Ann)-25.08%5.70%
10Y Return (Ann)-32.67%-8.79%
Sharpe Ratio-0.13-0.14
Sortino Ratio0.14-0.01
Omega Ratio1.021.00
Calmar Ratio-0.06-0.05
Martin Ratio-0.43-0.33
Ulcer Index14.49%11.41%
Daily Std Dev47.48%26.78%
Max Drawdown-99.95%-94.24%
Current Drawdown-99.57%-73.49%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between UCO and OIH is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

UCO vs. OIH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly higher than OIH's -3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has underperformed OIH with an annualized return of -32.67%, while OIH has yielded a comparatively higher -8.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.04%
-7.07%
UCO
OIH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCO vs. OIH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OIH's 0.35% expense ratio.


UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
Expense ratio chart for UCO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for OIH: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UCO vs. OIH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UCO, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.13
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UCO, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UCO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UCO, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UCO, currently valued at -0.43, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.43
OIH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OIH, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for OIH, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for OIH, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for OIH, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for OIH, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.33

UCO vs. OIH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is comparable to the OIH Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCO and OIH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.13
-0.14
UCO
OIH

Dividends

UCO vs. OIH - Dividend Comparison

UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.42%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.20%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%2.38%1.13%

Drawdowns

UCO vs. OIH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than OIH's maximum drawdown of -94.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and OIH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.57%
-69.18%
UCO
OIH

Volatility

UCO vs. OIH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 17.40% compared to VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) at 10.87%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OIH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.40%
10.87%
UCO
OIH