GIS vs. KMB
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.69%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for KMB. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -2.69%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.33% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 13.09%
- 6M
- -13.54%
- YTD
- -16.19%
- 1Y
- -19.76%
- 3Y*
- -17.88%
- 5Y*
- -5.14%
- 10Y*
- -2.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.20%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- -10.55%
- 3Y*
- -3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.88%
GIS vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -16.19% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 9.91% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and KMB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, GIS and KMB have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.83B
KMB:
$35.87B
GIS:
-$0.16
KMB:
$5.93
GIS:
1.09
KMB:
2.18
GIS:
2.71
KMB:
20.05
GIS:
$18.42B
KMB:
$16.54B
GIS:
$6.19B
KMB:
$5.93B
GIS:
$300.90M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
KMB
GIS vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.95 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.36 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -0.53 | -0.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -36.97% | -22.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -29.60% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -34.06% | -19.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -34.06% | -25.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -34.06% | -25.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.58% | -22.38% | -30.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -8.88% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.86% | 20.13% | -2.27% |
Volatility
GIS vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 13.02% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.94%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | 8.94% | +4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.43% | 18.50% | +2.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.40% | 26.96% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 20.56% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 21.22% | +1.20% |
Dividends
GIS vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than KMB's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.57% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.70% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
GIS vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and KMB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (13.02%) compared to KMB (8.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs KMB's -36.97%.
KMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer