GIS vs. CAG
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIS or CAG.
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and CAG is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GIS vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GIS:
-0.91
CAG:
-0.85
GIS:
-1.18
CAG:
-1.07
GIS:
0.86
CAG:
0.87
GIS:
-0.56
CAG:
-0.56
GIS:
-1.50
CAG:
-1.47
GIS:
13.19%
CAG:
13.80%
GIS:
21.76%
CAG:
24.02%
GIS:
-45.08%
CAG:
-56.94%
GIS:
-35.19%
CAG:
-35.97%
Fundamentals
GIS:
$31.07B
CAG:
$11.39B
GIS:
$4.55
CAG:
$0.68
GIS:
12.47
CAG:
35.09
GIS:
3.61
CAG:
0.33
GIS:
1.53
CAG:
0.97
GIS:
3.28
CAG:
1.30
GIS:
$19.64B
CAG:
$11.74B
GIS:
$6.95B
CAG:
$3.10B
GIS:
$3.99B
CAG:
$1.22B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -13.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 3.18%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.03% annualized return.
GIS
-12.65%
-7.52%
-18.46%
-17.98%
1.83%
3.18%
CAG
-13.46%
-11.21%
-17.42%
-18.56%
-2.98%
1.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIS vs. CAG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GIS
CAG
GIS vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIS vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than CAG's 6.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.40% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 6.00% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.49% | 3.99% | 2.19% | 1.97% | 2.37% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum CAG drawdown of -56.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and CAG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIS vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 7.08%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GIS vs. CAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
CAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 710.30M and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
CAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 266.60M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
CAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 145.10M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.