PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GIS vs. K
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and K is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

GIS vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.43%
41.26%
GIS
K

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIS:

-0.01

K:

2.14

Sortino Ratio

GIS:

0.12

K:

4.70

Omega Ratio

GIS:

1.01

K:

1.60

Calmar Ratio

GIS:

-0.01

K:

2.36

Martin Ratio

GIS:

-0.03

K:

14.48

Ulcer Index

GIS:

6.34%

K:

3.74%

Daily Std Dev

GIS:

18.88%

K:

25.24%

Max Drawdown

GIS:

-45.08%

K:

-58.26%

Current Drawdown

GIS:

-25.64%

K:

-0.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIS:

$36.60B

K:

$27.78B

EPS

GIS:

$4.20

K:

$2.99

PE Ratio

GIS:

15.70

K:

26.95

PEG Ratio

GIS:

3.34

K:

1.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIS:

$14.66B

K:

$12.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIS:

$5.01B

K:

$4.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIS:

$3.00B

K:

$1.89B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly lower than K's 48.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed K with an annualized return of 5.24%, while K has yielded a comparatively lower 4.64% annualized return.


GIS

YTD

1.67%

1M

1.64%

6M

-2.39%

1Y

-0.72%

5Y*

7.15%

10Y*

5.24%

K

YTD

48.69%

1M

0.44%

6M

38.67%

1Y

54.98%

5Y*

8.88%

10Y*

4.64%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.012.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.124.70
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.60
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.012.36
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.0314.48
GIS
K

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the K Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and K, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.01
2.14
GIS
K

Dividends

GIS vs. K - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than K's 2.81% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.72%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%
K
Kellogg Company
2.81%10.56%3.28%3.59%2.76%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. K - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum K drawdown of -58.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and K. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-25.64%
-0.47%
GIS
K

Volatility

GIS vs. K - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Kellogg Company (K) at 0.78%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.42%
0.78%
GIS
K

Financials

GIS vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab