GIS vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GIS vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -18.83% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 27.39% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Fundamentals
GIS:
$20.19B
ADM:
$35.18B
GIS:
$4.07
ADM:
$2.23
GIS:
9.15
ADM:
32.64
GIS:
1.10
ADM:
0.44
GIS:
$18.37B
ADM:
$80.29B
GIS:
$4.70B
ADM:
$5.03B
GIS:
$3.03B
ADM:
$2.41B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -18.83% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 27.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of -1.97%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.37% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -17.71%
- YTD
- -18.83%
- 6M
- -24.20%
- 1Y
- -34.63%
- 3Y*
- -21.16%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- -1.97%
ADM
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 27.39%
- 6M
- 23.63%
- 1Y
- 56.75%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
ADM
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | 2.01 | -3.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | 2.68 | -4.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.35 | -0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 4.30 | -5.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 12.30 | -14.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.46 | 2.01 | -3.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.28 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | 0.39 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.25 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than ADM's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.53% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.82% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -55.55%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.55% | -68.01% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.97% | -13.32% | -24.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.55% | -54.14% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.55% | -54.14% | -1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.07% | -17.41% | -36.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -21.63% | +11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.65% | 4.65% | +14.00% |
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 7.33%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 9.85% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 19.51% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.79% | 28.31% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.89% | 27.92% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 26.91% | -4.94% |
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.59B and revenue of 18.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 456.00M and revenue of 18.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.