GIS vs. ADM

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -9.72% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's -2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 3.56%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.98% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is comparable to the ADM Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and ADM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than ADM's 4.12% yield.

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 8.28%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.