PortfoliosLab logo
GIS vs. ADM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIS:

-1.01

ADM:

-0.63

Sortino Ratio

GIS:

-1.32

ADM:

-0.84

Omega Ratio

GIS:

0.84

ADM:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

GIS:

-0.59

ADM:

-0.34

Martin Ratio

GIS:

-1.57

ADM:

-1.04

Ulcer Index

GIS:

13.77%

ADM:

17.91%

Daily Std Dev

GIS:

21.78%

ADM:

26.88%

Max Drawdown

GIS:

-45.08%

ADM:

-68.01%

Current Drawdown

GIS:

-36.71%

ADM:

-45.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIS:

$29.44B

ADM:

$24.35B

EPS

GIS:

$4.55

ADM:

$2.84

PE Ratio

GIS:

11.82

ADM:

17.85

PEG Ratio

GIS:

3.57

ADM:

16.43

PS Ratio

GIS:

1.50

ADM:

0.29

PB Ratio

GIS:

3.24

ADM:

1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIS:

$19.64B

ADM:

$83.86B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIS:

$6.95B

ADM:

$5.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIS:

$3.99B

ADM:

$3.48B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 2.78%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.


GIS

YTD

-14.70%

1M

-9.69%

6M

-16.61%

1Y

-21.83%

5Y*

0.11%

10Y*

2.78%

ADM

YTD

-1.10%

1M

6.42%

6M

-2.77%

1Y

-16.85%

5Y*

10.74%

10Y*

2.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. ADM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ADM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ADM is 2020
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ADM is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ADM is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ADM is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ADM is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ADM is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the ADM Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and ADM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than ADM's 4.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.50%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
4.07%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%1.85%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 5.26%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
4.84B
20.18B
(GIS) Total Revenue
(ADM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIS vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
33.9%
5.9%
(GIS) Gross Margin
(ADM) Gross Margin
GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 20.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.9%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 248.00M and revenue of 20.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 295.00M and revenue of 20.18B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.