GIS vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIS or ADM.
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GIS:
-0.16
ADM:
-0.49
GIS:
-0.09
ADM:
-0.53
GIS:
0.99
ADM:
0.94
GIS:
-0.09
ADM:
-0.22
GIS:
-0.32
ADM:
-0.88
GIS:
9.37%
ADM:
12.76%
GIS:
19.10%
ADM:
22.92%
GIS:
-45.08%
ADM:
-68.01%
GIS:
-30.83%
ADM:
-49.97%
Fundamentals
GIS:
$32.82B
ADM:
$22.06B
GIS:
$4.55
ADM:
$3.68
GIS:
12.93
ADM:
12.53
GIS:
3.31
ADM:
16.43
GIS:
$19.90B
ADM:
$85.53B
GIS:
$6.95B
ADM:
$5.93B
GIS:
$4.08B
ADM:
$2.96B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -6.77% return, which is significantly higher than ADM's -8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 4.48%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.38% annualized return.
GIS
-6.77%
-1.32%
-14.14%
-4.77%
5.43%
4.48%
ADM
-8.75%
-10.12%
-21.36%
-11.81%
3.55%
2.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIS vs. ADM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GIS
ADM
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than ADM's 4.36% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 4.06% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 4.36% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 6.38%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 8.83%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities