GIS vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIS or ADM.
Key characteristics
| GIS | ADM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.09% | -18.01% |
| 1Y Return | -18.36% | -22.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.33% | -0.18% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.11% | 9.06% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.47% | 5.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.97 | -0.69 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.29% | 32.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.08% | -68.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.48% | -37.97% |
Fundamentals
| GIS | ADM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.99B | $30.16B |
| EPS | $4.36 | $6.43 |
| PE Ratio | 16.25 | 9.35 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.98 | 16.43 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.17B | $93.94B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $6.55B | $7.57B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $4.30B | $4.99B |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than ADM's -18.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 6.47%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than ADM's 3.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.35% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 3.15% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities