GIS vs. ADM
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, ADM in Farm Products. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -2.95%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for ADM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -17.43% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 44.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of -2.95%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.63% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- 6M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -17.43%
- 1Y
- -24.63%
- 3Y*
- -17.57%
- 5Y*
- -5.58%
- 10Y*
- -2.95%
ADM
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 33.77%
- YTD
- 44.73%
- 1Y
- 54.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
GIS vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -17.43% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 44.73% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1983 | 0.28 |
The correlation between GIS and ADM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.53B
ADM:
$39.54B
GIS:
-$0.16
ADM:
$2.23
GIS:
1.07
ADM:
0.49
GIS:
2.67
ADM:
1.74
GIS:
$18.42B
ADM:
$80.61B
GIS:
$6.19B
ADM:
$4.70B
GIS:
$300.90M
ADM:
$3.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
ADM
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.33 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 4.25 | -4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 10.68 | -12.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -68.01% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.48% | -12.79% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -49.22% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -54.14% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -54.14% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.28% | -6.17% | -47.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -21.57% | +11.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.89% | 5.08% | +12.81% |
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 12.66% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 7.27%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.66% | 7.27% | +5.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.61% | 18.83% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.03% | 26.63% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.80% | 28.29% | -6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 26.88% | -4.51% |
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than ADM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.51% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.67% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and ADM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (12.66%) compared to ADM (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs ADM's -68.01%.
ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and ADM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer