GIS vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GIS or ADM.
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GIS:
0.13
ADM:
-0.78
GIS:
0.31
ADM:
-0.81
GIS:
1.04
ADM:
0.85
GIS:
0.08
ADM:
-0.56
GIS:
0.38
ADM:
-1.38
GIS:
6.44%
ADM:
18.80%
GIS:
18.54%
ADM:
33.44%
GIS:
-45.08%
ADM:
-68.01%
GIS:
-25.99%
ADM:
-45.20%
Fundamentals
GIS:
$36.60B
ADM:
$24.64B
GIS:
$4.20
ADM:
$3.56
GIS:
15.70
ADM:
14.46
GIS:
3.34
ADM:
16.43
GIS:
$14.66B
ADM:
$87.02B
GIS:
$5.01B
ADM:
$5.63B
GIS:
$3.00B
ADM:
$3.72B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than ADM's -27.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed ADM with an annualized return of 5.08%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.36% annualized return.
GIS
1.19%
-0.30%
-3.45%
2.66%
7.04%
5.08%
ADM
-27.57%
-4.77%
-16.22%
-26.25%
4.76%
2.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than ADM's 3.96% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 3.74% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% | 2.85% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% | 1.85% | 1.75% |
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 5.22%, while Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities