GIS vs. ADM
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and ADM (Archer-Daniels-Midland Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, ADM in Farm Products. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -3.03%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for ADM. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GIS vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -19.35% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 39.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of -3.03%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.05%
- YTD
- -19.35%
- 1Y
- -22.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.89%
- 10Y*
- -3.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
ADM
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- YTD
- 39.84%
- 1Y
- 51.84%
- 3Y*
- 1.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $327.88M | $285.87M | $300.91M | |
| $325.79M | $365.30M | $369.16M |
GIS vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -19.35% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 39.84% | 18.24% | -27.52% | -20.42% | 39.98% | 37.33% | 12.44% | 17.10% | 5.28% | -9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and ADM is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1983 | 0.28 |
The correlation between GIS and ADM shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.08B
ADM:
$38.20B
GIS:
-$0.16
ADM:
$2.23
GIS:
1.05
ADM:
0.48
GIS:
2.60
ADM:
1.68
GIS:
$18.42B
ADM:
$80.61B
GIS:
$6.19B
ADM:
$4.70B
GIS:
$300.90M
ADM:
$3.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
ADM
GIS vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.31 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 4.00 | -4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 9.92 | -11.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, smaller than the maximum ADM drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and ADM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -68.01% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.28% | -12.79% | -21.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -49.22% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -54.14% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -54.14% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -9.34% | -45.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -21.55% | +11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 5.15% | +12.99% |
Volatility
GIS vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 7.93%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.73% | 7.93% | +2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.41% | 19.11% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.78% | 26.98% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 28.38% | -6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 26.92% | -4.41% |
Dividends
GIS vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than ADM's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.60% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.83% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
GIS vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
ADM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
ADM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
ADM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and ADM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to ADM (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs ADM's -68.01%.
ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and ADM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer