GIS vs. MDLZ
GIS (General Mills, Inc.) and MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — GIS in Packaged Foods, MDLZ in Confectioners. Over the past 10 years, GIS returned -3.03%/yr vs 6.26%/yr for MDLZ. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
GIS vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -19.35% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 17.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of -3.03%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.26% annualized return.
GIS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.05%
- YTD
- -19.35%
- 1Y
- -22.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.89%
- 10Y*
- -3.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
MDLZ
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- -2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.79M | $365.30M | $369.16M | |
| $659.78M | $585.31M | $549.68M |
GIS vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -19.35% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 17.73% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIS and MDLZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2001 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GIS and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GIS:
$19.08B
MDLZ:
$79.53B
GIS:
-$0.16
MDLZ:
$3.62
GIS:
1.05
MDLZ:
1.53
GIS:
$18.42B
MDLZ:
$39.68B
GIS:
$6.19B
MDLZ:
$12.36B
GIS:
$300.90M
MDLZ:
$5.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIS vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
GIS
MDLZ
GIS vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIS | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.02 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.02 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -0.04 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIS vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIS | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.63% | -42.52% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.28% | -18.62% | -15.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.45% | -29.00% | -24.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.63% | -29.14% | -30.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.63% | -29.74% | -29.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -12.81% | -41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.42% | -11.06% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.14% | 8.23% | +9.91% |
Volatility
GIS vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 10.73% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 9.83%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIS | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.73% | 9.83% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.41% | 18.40% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.78% | 23.07% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 20.09% | +1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 21.10% | +1.41% |
Dividends
GIS vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than MDLZ's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.83% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.21% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Financials
GIS vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GIS vs. MDLZ - Profitability Comparison
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
MDLZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.99B and revenue of 9.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
MDLZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.95B and revenue of 9.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
MDLZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.36B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIS and MDLZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to MDLZ (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIS dropped -59.63% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
MDLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIS and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer