PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GIS vs. MDLZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GISMDLZ
YTD Return10.39%-2.07%
1Y Return-17.64%-6.30%
3Y Return (Ann)7.98%7.15%
5Y Return (Ann)10.20%8.79%
10Y Return (Ann)6.44%9.29%
Sharpe Ratio-0.97-0.41
Daily Std Dev18.30%17.04%
Max Drawdown-45.08%-38.16%
Current Drawdown-19.26%-7.90%

Fundamentals


GISMDLZ
Market Cap$39.99B$94.98B
EPS$4.36$3.62
PE Ratio16.2519.51
PEG Ratio1.982.29
Revenue (TTM)$20.17B$36.02B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.55B$11.36B
EBITDA (TTM)$4.30B$7.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GIS and MDLZ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GIS vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than MDLZ's -2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 6.44%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


500.00%550.00%600.00%650.00%700.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
560.48%
627.14%
GIS
MDLZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


General Mills, Inc.

Mondelez International, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.97, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GIS, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GIS, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.85
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GIS, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.77
MDLZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -0.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MDLZ, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.81

GIS vs. MDLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GIS and MDLZ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.97
-0.41
GIS
MDLZ

Dividends

GIS vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than MDLZ's 2.35% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
3.34%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%2.85%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.35%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%1.90%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -38.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and MDLZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-19.26%
-7.90%
GIS
MDLZ

Volatility

GIS vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 4.90%. This indicates that GIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.81%
4.90%
GIS
MDLZ

Financials

GIS vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items