PortfoliosLab logo
GIS vs. CPB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GIS and CPB is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GIS vs. CPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Campbell Soup Company (CPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GIS:

-1.01

CPB:

-1.02

Sortino Ratio

GIS:

-1.32

CPB:

-1.36

Omega Ratio

GIS:

0.84

CPB:

0.84

Calmar Ratio

GIS:

-0.59

CPB:

-0.67

Martin Ratio

GIS:

-1.57

CPB:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

GIS:

13.77%

CPB:

17.30%

Daily Std Dev

GIS:

21.78%

CPB:

24.54%

Max Drawdown

GIS:

-45.08%

CPB:

-62.92%

Current Drawdown

GIS:

-36.71%

CPB:

-36.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GIS:

$29.44B

CPB:

$10.49B

EPS

GIS:

$4.55

CPB:

$1.73

PE Ratio

GIS:

11.82

CPB:

20.34

PEG Ratio

GIS:

3.57

CPB:

0.59

PS Ratio

GIS:

1.50

CPB:

1.04

PB Ratio

GIS:

3.24

CPB:

2.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

GIS:

$19.64B

CPB:

$7.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GIS:

$6.95B

CPB:

$2.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

GIS:

$3.99B

CPB:

$1.10B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIS achieves a -14.70% return, which is significantly higher than CPB's -17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, GIS has outperformed CPB with an annualized return of 2.78%, while CPB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.33% annualized return.


GIS

YTD

-14.70%

1M

-9.69%

6M

-16.61%

1Y

-21.83%

5Y*

0.11%

10Y*

2.78%

CPB

YTD

-17.31%

1M

-11.78%

6M

-22.50%

1Y

-24.82%

5Y*

-6.05%

10Y*

-0.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GIS vs. CPB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CPB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPB is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPB is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPB is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPB is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPB is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPB is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GIS vs. CPB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) and Campbell Soup Company (CPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is comparable to the CPB Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIS and CPB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GIS vs. CPB - Dividend Comparison

GIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than CPB's 4.43% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.50%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%
CPB
Campbell Soup Company
4.43%3.53%3.42%2.61%3.41%2.90%2.83%4.24%2.91%2.13%2.37%2.84%

Drawdowns

GIS vs. CPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIS drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum CPB drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIS and CPB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GIS vs. CPB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Mills, Inc. (GIS) is 5.26%, while Campbell Soup Company (CPB) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that GIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GIS vs. CPB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Mills, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20212022202320242025
4.84B
2.69B
(GIS) Total Revenue
(CPB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GIS vs. CPB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Mills, Inc. and Campbell Soup Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%20212022202320242025
33.9%
30.5%
(GIS) Gross Margin
(CPB) Gross Margin
GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

CPB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported a gross profit of 819.00M and revenue of 2.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

CPB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported an operating income of 327.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

CPB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Campbell Soup Company reported a net income of 173.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.