PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GINN vs. GSEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GINN vs. GSEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GINN achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly lower than GSEW's 10.61% return.


GINN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.62%
6M
8.49%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

GSEW

1D
0.99%
1M
3.38%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.52%
1Y
19.76%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GINN vs. GSEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
9.62%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
10.61%11.97%16.89%17.80%-17.54%25.43%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GINN and GSEW is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.88

The correlation between GINN and GSEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

GINN vs. GSEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GINN
GSEW

Technology

32.4%
20.9%

Healthcare

18.6%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

14.6%
9.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
14.3%

Communication Services

10.8%
3.5%

Industrials

6.1%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
5.7%

Utilities

1.9%
5.8%

Energy

1.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.1%
4.6%

Technology

GINN
32.4%
GSEW
20.9%

Healthcare

GINN
18.6%
GSEW
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GINN
14.6%
GSEW
9.1%

Financial Services

GINN
11.4%
GSEW
14.3%

Communication Services

GINN
10.8%
GSEW
3.5%

Industrials

GINN
6.1%
GSEW
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

GINN
2.0%
GSEW
5.7%

Utilities

GINN
1.9%
GSEW
5.8%

Energy

GINN
1.4%
GSEW
4.9%

Real Estate

GINN
0.8%
GSEW
4.0%

Basic Materials

GINN
0.1%
GSEW
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GINN vs. GSEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEW
GSEW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEW Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEW Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GINN vs. GSEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) and Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GINNGSEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

2.57

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

9.83

-2.68

GINN vs. GSEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the GSEW Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GINN and GSEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GINNGSEWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.64

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.53

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.62

-0.16

Drawdowns

GINN vs. GSEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GINN drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than GSEW's maximum drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINN and GSEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GINNGSEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

-38.65%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-7.72%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-18.18%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.25%

-25.74%

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

0.00%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-5.89%

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.02%

+1.62%

Volatility

GINN vs. GSEW - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) at 2.82%. This indicates that GINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GINNGSEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.82%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

9.09%

+2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

12.13%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.32%

16.92%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.04%

19.19%

+1.85%

GINN vs. GSEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GINN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GINN vs. GSEW - Dividend Comparison

GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GSEW's 1.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
1.41%1.52%1.46%1.64%1.74%1.34%1.53%1.66%1.56%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


GINN and GSEW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GINN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GSEW (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINN dropped -41.25% vs GSEW's -38.65%.

On 5-year performance, GSEW leads with 8.84% vs 7.01% for GINN. On fees, GSEW is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GSEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GSEW has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEW is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GSEW has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.15% for GINN.

GINN is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSEW is Large Cap Growth Equities. GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index, while GSEW tracks Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GINN and 0.09% for GSEW.

GSEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GINN and GSEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer