PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FXP vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FXP vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -23.04%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

FXP vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -23.04%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.

FXP

1D
4.65%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.64%
6M
16.82%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-16.52%
10Y*
-23.04%

NOBL

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.01%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.45%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXP vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		13.64%-45.32%-52.46%12.74%-11.73%23.56%-39.47%-29.01%12.45%-49.76%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		3.51%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and NOBL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013

-0.43

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FXP and NOBL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.43 to -0.23, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Often compared with FXP:
FXP vs. YXIFXP vs. FXIFXP vs. YANGFXP vs. KLIPFXP vs. FNILXFXP vs. RLBGXFXP vs. CQQQ
Often compared with NOBL:
NOBL vs. SCHDNOBL vs. SPYNOBL vs. VIGNOBL vs. DGRONOBL vs. SDYNOBL vs. VOONOBL vs. KNG

Return for Risk

FXP vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXP vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FXPNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.16
0.80

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.04
1.24

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

0.99

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.40

2.58

-2.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXP vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FXPNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

0.80

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.35

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

0.57

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.64

-1.08

Drawdowns

FXP vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and NOBL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FXPNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-35.43%

-64.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.21%

-9.11%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.34%

-15.36%

-66.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

-17.92%

-69.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.71%

-35.43%

-59.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-5.99%

-93.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.15%

-3.48%

-90.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.66%

3.50%

+14.16%

Volatility

FXP vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FXPNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

2.36%

+12.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

8.00%

+20.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

11.33%

+27.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.12%

14.38%

+48.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.91%

16.60%

+38.31%

FXP vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXP vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		4.12%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF		2.12%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

FXP and NOBL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs -23.04% for FXP. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.

FXP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.35% for NOBL.

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXP and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer