PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FXP vs. CQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FXP vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the AlphaShares China Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXP returned -23.04%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for CQQQ. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. FXP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

FXP vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FXP has underperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of -23.04%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 5.40% annualized return.

FXP

1D
4.65%
1M
5.53%
YTD
13.64%
6M
16.82%
1Y
-6.43%
3Y*
-30.22%
5Y*
-16.52%
10Y*
-23.04%

CQQQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
4.43%
YTD
2.46%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
-7.50%
10Y*
5.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXP vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		13.64%-45.32%-52.46%12.74%-11.73%23.56%-39.47%-29.01%12.45%-49.76%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF		2.46%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and CQQQ is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009

-0.81

The correlation between FXP and CQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

Invesco China Technology ETF

Often compared with FXP:
FXP vs. YXIFXP vs. FXIFXP vs. YANGFXP vs. KLIPFXP vs. FNILXFXP vs. RLBGXFXP vs. KWEB
Often compared with CQQQ:
CQQQ vs. KWEBCQQQ vs. MCHICQQQ vs. FXICQQQ vs. TCHICQQQ vs. VOOCQQQ vs. PGJCQQQ vs. CWEB

Return for Risk

FXP vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FXP
FXP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXP vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FXPCQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

1.11

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

1.68

-1.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.20

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

1.35

-1.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.40

3.16

-3.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FXP vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FXPCQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.11

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

-0.20

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.42

0.16

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.19

-0.63

Drawdowns

FXP vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than CQQQ's maximum drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and CQQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FXPCQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-73.99%

-25.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.21%

-24.41%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.34%

-35.93%

-46.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.85%

-66.96%

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.71%

-73.99%

-20.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-49.18%

-50.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-94.15%

-28.29%

-65.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.66%

10.39%

+7.27%

Volatility

FXP vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 15.06% compared to Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) at 11.60%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FXPCQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.06%

11.60%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.87%

21.88%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

29.78%

+9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.12%

38.02%

+25.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.91%

33.30%

+21.61%

FXP vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FXP vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than CQQQ's 2.11% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF		2.11%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50		4.12%9.57%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FXP and CQQQ have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXP has higher volatility (15.06%) compared to CQQQ (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXP dropped -99.94% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

On 10-year performance, CQQQ leads with 5.40% vs -23.04% for FXP. On fees, CQQQ is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CQQQ has performed better with a 5.40% return vs -23.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CQQQ is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.

FXP has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 2.11% for CQQQ.

FXP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CQQQ is China Equities. FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%), while CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FXP and 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXP and CQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer