PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FXP vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and KLIP is -0.86. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.9

Performance

FXP vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-35.27%
0.40%
FXP
KLIP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FXP:

-0.79

KLIP:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

FXP:

-1.04

KLIP:

0.50

Omega Ratio

FXP:

0.87

KLIP:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

FXP:

-0.54

KLIP:

0.49

Martin Ratio

FXP:

-1.29

KLIP:

1.03

Ulcer Index

FXP:

41.69%

KLIP:

4.56%

Daily Std Dev

FXP:

67.90%

KLIP:

17.57%

Max Drawdown

FXP:

-99.90%

KLIP:

-10.39%

Current Drawdown

FXP:

-99.87%

KLIP:

-3.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a -51.70% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's 3.66% return.


FXP

YTD

-51.70%

1M

-4.20%

6M

-35.27%

1Y

-56.16%

5Y*

-18.96%

10Y*

-19.60%

KLIP

YTD

3.66%

1M

3.39%

6M

0.40%

1Y

6.78%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FXP vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FXP and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
Expense ratio chart for FXP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for KLIP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FXP vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FXP, currently valued at -0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.790.27
The chart of Sortino ratio for FXP, currently valued at -1.04, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00-1.040.50
The chart of Omega ratio for FXP, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.871.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for FXP, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.740.49
The chart of Martin ratio for FXP, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-1.291.03
FXP
KLIP

The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.79
0.27
FXP
KLIP

Dividends

FXP vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than KLIP's 56.69% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
3.26%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
56.69%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FXP vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -10.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and KLIP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-62.16%
-3.08%
FXP
KLIP

Volatility

FXP vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 22.98% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 5.65%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
22.98%
5.65%
FXP
KLIP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab