FXP vs. KLIP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP).
FXP and KLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). It was launched on Nov 8, 2007. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023.
Performance
FXP vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FXP vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 11.77% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 43.27% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -8.98% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 10.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -8.98% return.
FXP
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 25.78%
- 1Y
- -12.70%
- 3Y*
- -27.68%
- 5Y*
- -16.72%
- 10Y*
- -23.48%
KLIP
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- -8.98%
- 6M
- -12.63%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXP vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FXP and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
FXP vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
FXP
KLIP
FXP vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FXP | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | -0.06 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | 0.05 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | -0.08 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -0.26 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FXP | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | -0.06 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.35 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between FXP and KLIP is -0.86. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FXP vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than KLIP's 28.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 4.18% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.24% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FXP vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and KLIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXP | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -18.61% | -81.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.42% | -17.23% | -35.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -14.21% | -85.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.10% | -3.34% | -90.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.47% | 5.18% | +37.29% |
Volatility
FXP vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 7.16%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FXP | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 7.16% | +6.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.87% | 13.48% | +15.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.71% | 19.76% | +27.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.04% | 18.19% | +44.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.96% | 18.19% | +36.77% |