PortfoliosLab logo
FXP vs. KLIP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FXP and KLIP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FXP vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FXP:

-0.78

KLIP:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

FXP:

-0.98

KLIP:

0.39

Omega Ratio

FXP:

0.87

KLIP:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

FXP:

-0.54

KLIP:

0.21

Martin Ratio

FXP:

-1.22

KLIP:

0.86

Ulcer Index

FXP:

44.01%

KLIP:

4.58%

Daily Std Dev

FXP:

70.94%

KLIP:

20.69%

Max Drawdown

FXP:

-99.92%

KLIP:

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

FXP:

-99.91%

KLIP:

-3.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXP achieves a -30.58% return, which is significantly lower than KLIP's 5.72% return.


FXP

YTD

-30.58%

1M

-6.93%

6M

-35.11%

1Y

-56.75%

3Y*

-29.28%

5Y*

-24.73%

10Y*

-18.99%

KLIP

YTD

5.72%

1M

3.17%

6M

8.18%

1Y

5.18%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FXP vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FXP and KLIP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FXP vs. KLIP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FXP is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FXP is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FXP is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FXP is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FXP is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FXP is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

KLIP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLIP is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLIP is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLIP is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FXP vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FXP Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the KLIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXP and KLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FXP vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison

FXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than KLIP's 39.90% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
8.45%3.55%2.20%0.06%0.00%0.06%1.20%0.16%
KLIP
KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF
39.90%54.85%61.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FXP vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXP drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXP and KLIP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FXP vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a higher volatility of 13.10% compared to KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) at 2.64%. This indicates that FXP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...