FVAL vs. ROE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FVAL is passively managed, while ROE is actively managed. Over the past year, FVAL returned 31.42% vs 37.99% for ROE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.

Performance

FVAL vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.

FVAL

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 31.42%
• 3Y*: 20.96%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —

ROE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 8.10%
• YTD: 20.98%
• 6M: 21.56%
• 1Y: 37.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVAL vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	11.14%	19.56%	18.05%	4.93%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	20.98%	17.20%	18.34%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and ROE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023	0.87

The correlation between FVAL and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FVAL vs. ROE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FVAL	ROE
Technology	32.6%	36.1%
Financial Services	11.4%	11.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.4%
Communication Services	9.4%	10.6%
Healthcare	9.3%	8.7%
Industrials	8.1%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	4.7%
Energy	4.1%	3.5%
Real Estate	2.4%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.8%
Utilities	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

FVAL vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVAL

FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 79
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 83
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVAL vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVAL	ROE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	3.69	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	4.41	-0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	19.92	-4.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVAL vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVAL	ROE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.74	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.39	-0.58

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than ROE's maximum drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and ROE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVAL	ROE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-19.10%	-18.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-8.66%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.04%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-2.59%	-1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.91%	+0.08%

Volatility

FVAL vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.70%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVAL	ROE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	3.79%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	10.66%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	13.94%	-2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	15.78%	+0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	15.78%	+2.33%

FVAL vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVAL vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than ROE's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	1.49%	1.61%	1.60%	1.69%	1.79%	1.41%	1.61%	1.77%	2.06%	1.62%	0.45%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.94%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVAL and ROE in my portfolio?

FVAL and ROE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVAL or ROE?

ROE has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to FVAL (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs ROE's -19.10%.

Which ETF is better, FVAL or ROE?

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 37.99% vs 31.42% for FVAL. On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FVAL or ROE?

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 37.99% return vs 31.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FVAL or ROE?

FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FVAL or ROE?

FVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.

What is the main difference between FVAL and ROE?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.49% for ROE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.