ROE vs. MTUM

In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 12.19% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROE and MTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than MTUM's 0.83% yield.

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and MTUM.

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.