PortfoliosLab logo
ROE vs. DUHP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ROE and DUHP is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

ROE vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
17.19%
20.33%
ROE
DUHP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ROE:

0.33

DUHP:

0.48

Sortino Ratio

ROE:

0.60

DUHP:

0.79

Omega Ratio

ROE:

1.08

DUHP:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ROE:

0.33

DUHP:

0.47

Martin Ratio

ROE:

1.32

DUHP:

1.97

Ulcer Index

ROE:

4.81%

DUHP:

4.30%

Daily Std Dev

ROE:

19.07%

DUHP:

17.66%

Max Drawdown

ROE:

-19.10%

DUHP:

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

ROE:

-10.43%

DUHP:

-10.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a -5.05% return, which is significantly lower than DUHP's -4.74% return.


ROE

YTD

-5.05%

1M

-3.82%

6M

-5.75%

1Y

4.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

DUHP

YTD

-4.74%

1M

-4.49%

6M

-5.78%

1Y

7.56%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROE vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for ROE: current value is 0.49%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ROE: 0.49%
Expense ratio chart for DUHP: current value is 0.21%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DUHP: 0.21%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ROE vs. DUHP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROE is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROE is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROE is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROE is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROE is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROE is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DUHP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DUHP is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DUHP is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DUHP is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DUHP is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DUHP is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DUHP is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ROE vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ROE, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
ROE: 0.33
DUHP: 0.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for ROE, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
ROE: 0.60
DUHP: 0.79
The chart of Omega ratio for ROE, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
ROE: 1.08
DUHP: 1.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for ROE, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
ROE: 0.33
DUHP: 0.47
The chart of Martin ratio for ROE, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
ROE: 1.32
DUHP: 1.97

The current ROE Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROE and DUHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.33
0.48
ROE
DUHP

Dividends

ROE vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than DUHP's 1.21% yield.


TTM202420232022
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
1.05%1.18%0.68%0.00%
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
1.21%1.13%1.51%1.10%

Drawdowns

ROE vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, roughly equal to the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and DUHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.43%
-10.17%
ROE
DUHP

Volatility

ROE vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a higher volatility of 13.66% compared to DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) at 13.00%. This indicates that ROE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.66%
13.00%
ROE
DUHP