ROE vs. DUHP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) and DUHP (Dimensional US High Profitability ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROE is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Astoria, while DUHP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROE returned 20.30%/yr vs 16.06%/yr for DUHP. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ROE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for DUHP.

Performance

ROE vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROE achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than DUHP's 8.79% return.

ROE

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 16.21%
• YTD: 20.35%
• 1Y: 33.36%
• 3Y*: 20.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.32%

DUHP

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.01%
• 6M: 7.04%
• YTD: 8.79%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: 16.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	$29.95M	$29.57M	$35.23M
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	$1.20M	$1.18M	$910.23K

ROE vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	20.35%	17.20%	18.34%	4.31%
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	8.79%	13.77%	19.49%	5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ROE and DUHP is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.90

The correlation between ROE and DUHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROE vs. DUHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROE	DUHP
Technology	33.9%	37.0%
Financial Services	11.9%	9.1%
Communication Services	11.1%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	9.0%
Healthcare	10.2%	13.0%
Industrials	9.0%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	7.0%
Energy	2.9%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Utilities	2.0%	1.0%
Basic Materials	1.0%	0.7%

Return for Risk

ROE vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 88
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DUHP

DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 53
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROE vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROE	DUHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	1.28	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	1.84	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	1.70	+2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.82	7.26	+8.56

ROE vs. DUHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROE Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROE and DUHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROE vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, roughly equal to the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and DUHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROE	DUHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-20.05%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.66%	-8.99%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.10%	-17.86%	-1.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-1.67%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.54%	-3.93%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.10%	-0.07%

Volatility

ROE vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) at 2.87%. This indicates that ROE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROE	DUHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	2.87%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	9.63%	+2.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	11.90%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	16.19%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.87%	16.19%	-0.32%

ROE vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROE vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than DUHP's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUHP Dimensional US High Profitability ETF	0.93%	1.02%	1.13%	1.51%	1.10%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	1.01%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROE and DUHP in my portfolio?

ROE and DUHP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROE or DUHP?

ROE has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to DUHP (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROE dropped -19.10% vs DUHP's -20.05%.

Which ETF is better, ROE or DUHP?

On 3-year performance, ROE leads with 20.30% vs 16.06% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROE or DUHP?

Over the 3-year period, ROE has performed better with a 20.30% return vs 16.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROE or DUHP?

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROE or DUHP?

ROE has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.93% for DUHP.

What is the main difference between ROE and DUHP?

ROE is categorized as Quality Factor, while DUHP is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ROE and 0.21% for DUHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.