FTOH vs. ATMP

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ATMP.

Performance

FTOH vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 22.14% return.

FTOH

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 2.07%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATMP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 21.51%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: 21.72%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 4.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.55%	0.08%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	22.14%	2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and ATMP is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

FTOH vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTOH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 56
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTOH vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTOH	ATMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.29	—

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and ATMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTOH	ATMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-80.86%	+78.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.48%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-4.41%	+3.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-30.94%	+30.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTOH	ATMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49%	14.50%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.49%	22.11%	-18.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.49%	27.64%	-24.15%

FTOH vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTOH vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%	0.00%
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.54%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTOH and ATMP in my portfolio?

FTOH and ATMP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTOH or ATMP?

On fees, FTOH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTOH or ATMP?

FTOH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTOH or ATMP?

FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

What is the main difference between FTOH and ATMP?

FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ATMP is MLPs. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.95% for ATMP.