PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTOH vs. TAXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTOH vs. TAXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than TAXT's 1.58% return.


FTOH

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.79%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXT

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.12%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. TAXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and TAXT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025

0.68

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTOH vs. TAXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTOH vs. TAXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. TAXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, roughly equal to the maximum TAXT drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and TAXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTOHTAXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-2.49%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.49%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-0.48%

-0.05%

Volatility

FTOH vs. TAXT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTOHTAXTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.58%

2.53%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

2.53%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.58%

2.53%

+1.05%

FTOH vs. TAXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXT's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTOH vs. TAXT - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than TAXT's 2.54% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTOH and TAXT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.

TAXT has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.17% for FTOH.

FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while TAXT tracks ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.05% for TAXT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTOH and TAXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer