FTOH vs. AMUB

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.

Performance

FTOH vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than AMUB's 16.42% return.

FTOH

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.42%
• 6M: 2.07%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMUB

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 14.03%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 1Y: 14.93%
• 3Y*: 14.43%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.55%	0.08%
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B	16.42%	0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and AMUB is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

FTOH vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTOH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMUB

AMUB Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
AMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
AMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTOH vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTOH	AMUB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.56	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.19	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.56	—

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and AMUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTOH	AMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-79.46%	+76.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-6.59%	+6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-29.02%	+28.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTOH	AMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49%	14.21%	-10.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.49%	20.10%	-16.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.49%	27.15%	-23.66%

FTOH vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTOH vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while AMUB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B	0.00%	0.00%
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF	2.54%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTOH and AMUB in my portfolio?

FTOH and AMUB have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTOH or AMUB?

On fees, FTOH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTOH or AMUB?

FTOH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTOH or AMUB?

FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for AMUB.

What is the main difference between FTOH and AMUB?

FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while AMUB is MLPs. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.80% for AMUB.