PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTOH vs. TAXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTOH vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 1.00% return.


FTOH

1D
0.12%
1M
1.06%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXI

1D
0.06%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.00%
6M
1.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and TAXI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTOH vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTOH vs. TAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTOHTAXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

2.95

-1.73

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and TAXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTOHTAXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-2.23%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.74%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-0.46%

-0.11%

Volatility

FTOH vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTOHTAXIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

1.90%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

1.90%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

1.90%

+1.74%

FTOH vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTOH vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTOH and TAXI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.

FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.

FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while TAXI tracks ICE Intermediate Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.05% for TAXI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTOH and TAXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer