PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCIX vs. FKDNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCIX achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCIX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 7.00%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.


FTCIX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.78%
YTD
4.96%
6M
5.29%
1Y
13.56%
3Y*
10.64%
5Y*
4.48%
10Y*
7.00%

FKDNX

1D
-1.14%
1M
5.66%
YTD
12.20%
6M
10.54%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
18.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
4.96%12.17%8.05%11.38%-15.20%8.18%22.41%13.24%-3.44%9.81%
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
12.20%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCIX and FKDNX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.81

The correlation between FTCIX and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCIX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCIX
FTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTCIXFKDNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.43

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

4.46

+7.56

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCIX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTCIXFKDNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.44

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.41

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Drawdowns

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCIX drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCIX and FKDNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCIXFKDNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-51.63%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-20.49%

+15.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.64%

-26.23%

+18.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-48.28%

+23.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

-48.28%

+23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-1.14%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-11.25%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

6.57%

-5.41%

Volatility

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) is 1.99%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that FTCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCIXFKDNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

4.99%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

15.86%

-10.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

20.41%

-14.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.16%

26.20%

-17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.07%

24.61%

-15.54%

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCIX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.95%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
5.33%5.99%2.52%2.40%3.73%8.58%13.27%7.14%7.71%1.51%1.76%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCIX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to FTCIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCIX dropped -25.18% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

FTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCIX and FKDNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer