PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKDNX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKDNX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.33%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.


FKDNX

1D
1.09%
1M
7.30%
YTD
13.02%
6M
12.19%
1Y
30.84%
3Y*
25.67%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
18.33%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKDNX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
13.02%18.59%30.57%44.42%-40.30%12.53%57.68%36.36%2.85%39.29%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FKDNX and VOO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.86

The correlation between FKDNX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKDNX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKDNX
FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKDNX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKDNXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

2.53

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

3.43

-1.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.42

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

15.95

-11.05

FKDNX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKDNXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.53

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.87

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.89

-0.22

Drawdowns

FKDNX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKDNXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.63%

-33.99%

-17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.49%

-8.90%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.23%

-18.69%

-7.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-24.52%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-33.99%

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-3.69%

-7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

1.91%

+4.66%

Volatility

FKDNX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKDNXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

2.74%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

8.88%

+6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

11.78%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.21%

16.81%

+9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

18.01%

+6.60%

FKDNX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKDNX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.88%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKDNX
Franklin DynaTech Fund
9.88%11.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.43%0.00%0.74%2.92%1.77%3.55%2.46%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKDNX and VOO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKDNX dropped -51.63% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKDNX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer