FKDNX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a 34.08% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 26.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 14.39%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FKDNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.78%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.