FKDNX vs. EPGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX).
FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968. EPGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | -10.96% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 44.42% | -40.30% | 12.53% | 57.68% | 36.36% | 2.85% | 39.29% |
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | -5.44% | 14.27% | 15.57% | 35.25% | -24.67% | 22.66% | 43.38% | 33.69% | -0.04% | 34.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a -10.96% return, which is significantly lower than EPGAX's -5.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKDNX having a 15.95% annualized return and EPGAX not far behind at 15.41%.
FKDNX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
EPGAX
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -4.99%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EPGAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKDNX vs. EPGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FKDNX
EPGAX
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKDNX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.38 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 4.84 | -2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKDNX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.49 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKDNX and EPGAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Dividend Comparison
FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, more than EPGAX's 0.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 12.54% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 2.26% | 12.86% | 12.06% | 9.56% | 7.10% | 12.35% | 6.39% | 2.37% |
Drawdowns
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, smaller than the maximum EPGAX drawdown of -63.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and EPGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKDNX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.63% | -63.20% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | -12.80% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -30.60% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -31.17% | -17.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.48% | -8.89% | -7.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -16.32% | +5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 3.66% | +2.63% |
Volatility
FKDNX vs. EPGAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) at 7.81%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKDNX | EPGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 7.81% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 13.35% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 21.88% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 20.75% | +5.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 20.77% | +3.76% |