PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FTCIX vs. PULS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FTCIX and PULS is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

FTCIX vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.10%
2.68%
FTCIX
PULS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FTCIX:

1.57

PULS:

12.35

Sortino Ratio

FTCIX:

2.27

PULS:

29.32

Omega Ratio

FTCIX:

1.28

PULS:

7.98

Calmar Ratio

FTCIX:

0.80

PULS:

58.71

Martin Ratio

FTCIX:

7.38

PULS:

372.34

Ulcer Index

FTCIX:

1.37%

PULS:

0.02%

Daily Std Dev

FTCIX:

6.41%

PULS:

0.48%

Max Drawdown

FTCIX:

-26.48%

PULS:

-5.85%

Current Drawdown

FTCIX:

-3.00%

PULS:

-0.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCIX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 0.65% return.


FTCIX

YTD

2.73%

1M

1.78%

6M

2.52%

1Y

9.92%

5Y*

4.43%

10Y*

2.88%

PULS

YTD

0.65%

1M

0.40%

6M

2.71%

1Y

5.87%

5Y*

3.22%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FTCIX vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.


FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
Expense ratio chart for FTCIX: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for PULS: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTCIX vs. PULS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTCIX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTCIX is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTCIX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTCIX is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTCIX is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTCIX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PULS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PULS is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PULS is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PULS is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PULS is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PULS is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PULS is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FTCIX vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FTCIX, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.5712.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for FTCIX, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.2729.32
The chart of Omega ratio for FTCIX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.287.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for FTCIX, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.8058.71
The chart of Martin ratio for FTCIX, currently valued at 7.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.007.38372.34
FTCIX
PULS

The current FTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 12.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCIX and PULS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.004.006.008.0010.0012.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.57
12.35
FTCIX
PULS

Dividends

FTCIX vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

FTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than PULS's 5.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
2.45%2.52%2.40%1.77%2.36%12.15%2.37%2.88%1.59%1.06%2.13%2.86%
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
5.51%5.63%5.48%2.30%1.19%1.85%2.92%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FTCIX vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCIX drawdown since its inception was -26.48%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCIX and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.00%
-0.02%
FTCIX
PULS

Volatility

FTCIX vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.09%. This indicates that FTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.63%
0.09%
FTCIX
PULS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab