PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCIX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCIX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 8.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTCIX having a 6.72% annualized return and TPDAX not far behind at 6.51%.


FTCIX

1D
1.01%
1M
-0.60%
6M
2.71%
YTD
4.18%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
6.72%
ALL TIME*
5.83%

TPDAX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.27%
6M
0.82%
YTD
8.31%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
6.51%
ALL TIME*
5.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
4.18%12.17%8.05%11.38%-15.20%8.18%22.41%13.24%-3.44%9.81%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
8.31%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCIX and TPDAX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2009

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FTCIX and TPDAX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCIX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTCIX
FTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCIXTPDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.71

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

6.54

+1.70

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCIX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCIX drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCIX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCIXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-22.29%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.22%

-8.09%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.64%

-8.09%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

-17.58%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

-22.29%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-5.84%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.93%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

3.34%

-2.13%

Volatility

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) is 2.10%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that FTCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCIXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.27%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

9.53%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

11.64%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

10.25%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

9.95%

-0.90%

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCIX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

FTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than TPDAX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCIX
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund
6.57%5.99%2.52%2.40%3.73%8.58%13.27%7.14%7.71%1.51%1.76%4.93%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.74%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCIX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to FTCIX (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCIX dropped -25.18% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCIX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer