FKDNX vs. VUG
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG).
FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968. VUG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2000.
Performance
FKDNX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FKDNX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | -10.96% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 44.42% | -40.30% | 12.53% | 57.68% | 36.36% | 2.85% | 39.29% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | -9.39% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a -10.96% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's -9.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKDNX having a 15.95% annualized return and VUG not far ahead at 16.16%.
FKDNX
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -10.96%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 15.95%
VUG
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -9.39%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 16.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FKDNX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FKDNX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
FKDNX
VUG
FKDNX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FKDNX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.32 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 1.19 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 4.15 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FKDNX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.53 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.76 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.57 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FKDNX and VUG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FKDNX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, more than VUG's 0.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 12.54% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Drawdowns
FKDNX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and VUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKDNX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.63% | -50.68% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.49% | -16.53% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -35.61% | -12.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -35.61% | -12.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.48% | -12.25% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -7.13% | -4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 4.72% | +1.57% |
Volatility
FKDNX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 7.12%. This indicates that FKDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FKDNX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 7.12% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.81% | 12.70% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 22.70% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 22.22% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 21.38% | +3.15% |