FKDNX vs. VGT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both funds - FKDNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. FKDNX is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX returned 16.45%/yr vs 24.06%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FKDNX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

FKDNX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 16.45%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.

FKDNX

• 1D: 4.48%
• 1M: -5.22%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 6.09%
• 10Y*: 16.45%
• ALL TIME*: 13.36%

VGT

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.30%
• 6M: 21.30%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 1Y: 34.81%
• 3Y*: 26.48%
• 5Y*: 17.81%
• 10Y*: 24.06%
• ALL TIME*: 14.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	$440.89M	$515.41M	$573.34M

FKDNX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	1.52%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	20.36%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	2.46%	37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FKDNX and VGT is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.91

The correlation between FKDNX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKDNX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 10
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 52
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKDNX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKDNX	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.31	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	1.82	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.23	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.36	1.94	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	5.23	-4.19

FKDNX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKDNX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -51.63%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKDNX	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.63%	-54.63%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.49%	-16.40%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.23%	-27.23%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	-35.07%	-13.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	-35.07%	-13.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.55%	-9.93%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.24%	-7.95%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.07%	6.07%	+1.00%

Volatility

FKDNX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) have volatilities of 8.76% and 8.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKDNX	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.76%	8.42%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	20.14%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.82%	24.28%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.75%	25.83%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.87%	24.89%	-0.02%

FKDNX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKDNX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKDNX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.00%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	11.00%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.38%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKDNX and VGT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FKDNX and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FKDNX or VGT?

FKDNX has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKDNX dropped -51.63% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.