FTCIX vs. CCLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX).
FTCIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 30, 1996. CCLAX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005.
Performance
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCIX Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund | -2.51% | 12.17% | 8.05% | 11.38% | -15.20% | 8.18% | 22.41% | 13.24% | -3.44% | 9.81% |
CCLAX Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund | -2.81% | 10.23% | 6.39% | 10.07% | -14.32% | 7.73% | 12.18% | 15.62% | -2.96% | 8.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTCIX achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than CCLAX's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCIX has outperformed CCLAX with an annualized return of 6.34%, while CCLAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.07% annualized return.
FTCIX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -2.51%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
CCLAX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTCIX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CCLAX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTCIX vs. CCLAX — Risk / Return Rank
FTCIX
CCLAX
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) and Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTCIX | CCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.33 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.18 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 4.75 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTCIX | CCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.94 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTCIX and CCLAX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Dividend Comparison
FTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, more than CCLAX's 3.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCIX Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.47% | 5.99% | 2.52% | 2.40% | 3.73% | 8.58% | 13.27% | 7.14% | 7.71% | 1.51% | 1.76% | 4.93% |
CCLAX Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund | 3.37% | 3.31% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 2.22% | 5.37% | 4.16% | 4.14% | 4.83% | 2.22% | 3.52% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTCIX drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, which is greater than CCLAX's maximum drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCIX and CCLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTCIX | CCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.18% | -23.98% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.86% | -5.03% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.18% | -18.86% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.18% | -18.86% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -4.82% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -2.87% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.25% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FTCIX vs. CCLAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Conservative Allocation Fund (FTCIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund (CCLAX) at 2.48%. This indicates that FTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTCIX | CCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 2.48% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.55% | 3.95% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 6.63% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 7.02% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 6.69% | +2.34% |