FSAGX vs. VGPMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSAGX (Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio) and VGPMX (Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund) are both mutual funds - FSAGX is a Gold fund managed by Fidelity, while VGPMX is a Global Equities fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX returned 8.60%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for VGPMX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSAGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for VGPMX.

Performance

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 16.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 8.60%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.

FSAGX

• 1D: 4.33%
• 1M: -1.70%
• 6M: -15.93%
• YTD: -7.00%
• 1Y: 45.29%
• 3Y*: 35.46%
• 5Y*: 15.42%
• 10Y*: 8.60%
• ALL TIME*: 6.57%

VGPMX

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 6.45%
• YTD: 16.88%
• 1Y: 58.07%
• 3Y*: 27.54%
• 5Y*: 20.65%
• 10Y*: 9.11%
• ALL TIME*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	-7.00%	143.05%	14.97%	-0.37%	-13.46%	-10.44%	26.83%	35.50%	-13.00%	8.63%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	16.88%	65.96%	5.78%	10.06%	7.34%	19.50%	17.21%	20.67%	-32.26%	13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and VGPMX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985	0.75

The correlation between FSAGX and VGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSAGX

FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 30
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

VGPMX

VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 95
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSAGX	VGPMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	3.13	-2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	3.78	-2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.53	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	4.42	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	14.96	-12.21

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, roughly equal to the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and VGPMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSAGX	VGPMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.21%	-78.85%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.90%	-12.80%	-25.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.90%	-14.63%	-23.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.94%	-22.71%	-23.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.57%	-54.56%	+3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.89%	-3.52%	-28.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.34%	-34.44%	+1.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.13%	3.77%	+13.36%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 12.39% compared to Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) at 4.49%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSAGX	VGPMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	4.49%	+7.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.50%	15.24%	+23.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.25%	18.11%	+28.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.53%	17.49%	+17.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.42%	20.63%	+12.79%

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSAGX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than VGPMX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio	5.52%	2.17%	3.62%	0.99%	0.36%	1.60%	4.40%	0.40%	0.00%	0.22%	3.57%	0.00%
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund	3.34%	2.59%	2.68%	3.22%	3.27%	3.26%	2.03%	2.39%	3.02%	0.02%	1.72%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSAGX and VGPMX in my portfolio?

FSAGX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSAGX or VGPMX?

FSAGX has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to VGPMX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.