FM.TO vs. BHP
Compare and contrast key facts about First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and BHP Group (BHP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FM.TO or BHP.
Key characteristics
| FM.TO | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 80.00% | -11.77% |
| 1Y Return | -40.84% | 4.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -12.63% | 0.74% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.54% | 11.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.22% | 5.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.59 | 0.25 |
| Daily Std Dev | 64.97% | 25.42% |
| Max Drawdown | -90.98% | -75.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -56.13% | -12.51% |
Fundamentals
| FM.TO | BHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$15.20B | $144.98B |
| EPS | -CA$2.33 | $2.92 |
| PE Ratio | 12.33 | 19.59 |
| PEG Ratio | -9.80 | 0.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$5.93B | $55.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$2.20B | $43.24B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.96B | $26.85B |
Correlation
The correlation between FM.TO and BHP is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FM.TO vs. BHP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 80.00% return, which is significantly higher than BHP's -11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of -1.22%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FM.TO vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FM.TO vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison
FM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than BHP's 5.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.41% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% | 0.87% | 0.90% |
BHP BHP Group | 5.17% | 4.98% | 10.27% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.32% | 5.11% | 3.40% |
Drawdowns
FM.TO vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, which is greater than BHP's maximum drawdown of -75.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and BHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FM.TO vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison
First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.06% compared to BHP Group (BHP) at 8.02%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FM.TO vs. BHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Quantum Minerals Ltd. and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities