PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
9.10%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-4.83%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
10.49%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's 10.49% return.


FSAGX

1D
7.16%
1M
-20.09%
YTD
9.10%
6M
21.69%
1Y
97.87%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
20.99%
10Y*
14.83%

IAUM

1D
1.71%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
10.49%
6M
23.22%
1Y
52.68%
3Y*
34.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSAGX vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAGXIAUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

1.92

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.35

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

2.74

+0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.32

10.02

+2.29

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAGXIAUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.92

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.31

-1.08

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and IAUM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
1.99%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and IAUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-20.87%

-56.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.85%

-19.15%

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-11.69%

-8.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.41%

-4.99%

-28.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

5.23%

+2.82%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) at 10.38%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

10.38%

+7.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.68%

24.00%

+11.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.20%

27.53%

+15.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.90%

17.79%

+15.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.13%

17.79%

+15.34%