PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAGX vs. SGDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than SGDLX's -2.59% return.


FSAGX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-6.88%
1Y
50.39%
3Y*
40.63%
5Y*
16.97%
10Y*
10.62%

SGDLX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
61.32%
3Y*
43.77%
5Y*
19.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
-2.07%143.05%14.97%-0.37%-13.46%-10.44%29.70%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
-2.59%147.67%20.58%1.91%-13.21%-11.79%35.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAGX and SGDLX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.96

The correlation between FSAGX and SGDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAGX vs. SGDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAGX
FSAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDLX
SGDLX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SGDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAGXSGDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.83

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

4.85

-0.90

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the SGDLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAGX and SGDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, which is greater than SGDLX's maximum drawdown of -47.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and SGDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAGXSGDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.21%

-47.59%

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.40%

-33.98%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.40%

-33.98%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.94%

-42.98%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.29%

-26.67%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-18.35%

-14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.09%

12.80%

+0.29%

Volatility

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Sprott Gold Equity Fund (SGDLX) at 16.04%. This indicates that FSAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAGXSGDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

16.04%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.83%

36.04%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.10%

42.26%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.10%

32.07%

+2.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.39%

34.17%

-0.78%

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDLX's 1.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAGX vs. SGDLX - Dividend Comparison

FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than SGDLX's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSAGX
Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio
5.24%2.17%3.62%0.99%0.36%1.60%4.40%0.40%0.00%0.22%3.57%
SGDLX
Sprott Gold Equity Fund
0.69%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FSAGX and SGDLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSAGX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to SGDLX (16.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAGX dropped -77.21% vs SGDLX's -47.59%.

SGDLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAGX and SGDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer