FLQL vs. SPYG
FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLQL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQL returned 14.33%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
FLQL vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return.
FLQL
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 9.76%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
FLQL vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 11.18% | 19.64% | 24.33% | 23.58% | -14.83% | 26.58% | 10.67% | 29.09% | -2.79% | 15.04% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 15.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQL and SPYG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FLQL and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQL vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQL
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FLQL
SPYG
Communication Services
FLQL
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
FLQL
SPYG
Healthcare
FLQL
SPYG
Financial Services
FLQL
SPYG
Industrials
FLQL
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
FLQL
SPYG
Real Estate
FLQL
SPYG
Basic Materials
FLQL
SPYG
Utilities
FLQL
SPYG
Energy
FLQL
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQL vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
FLQL
SPYG
FLQL vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLQL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 1.96 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 7.79 | +5.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLQL vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -67.63% | +33.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -13.76% | +4.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -22.14% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -32.67% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -5.52% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.03% | -24.28% | +20.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.46% | -1.50% |
Volatility
FLQL vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is 4.83%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that FLQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQL | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 7.26% | -2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 13.90% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.47% | 17.26% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 21.36% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 20.73% | -3.21% |
FLQL vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLQL vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 1.02% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.82% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLQL and SPYG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FLQL (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.33% vs 14.11% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLQL has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 14.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.
FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
FLQL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.04% for SPYG.
FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQL and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer