PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLQL vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLQL vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than PBUS's 11.64% return.


FLQL

1D
1.19%
1M
1.31%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.02%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
21.95%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.75%

PBUS

1D
1.47%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.61%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
22.86%
3Y*
20.88%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.69M$6.06M$6.47M
$18.15M$12.95M$26.28M

FLQL vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
13.02%19.64%24.33%23.58%-14.83%26.58%10.67%29.09%-2.79%9.63%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
11.64%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and PBUS is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017

0.88

The correlation between FLQL and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLQL vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLQL
PBUS

Technology

39.4%
37.9%

Communication Services

10.5%
9.8%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.1%

Financial Services

9.6%
11.4%

Industrials

9.0%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.5%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Energy

2.6%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

FLQL
39.4%
PBUS
37.9%

Communication Services

FLQL
10.5%
PBUS
9.8%

Healthcare

FLQL
10.2%
PBUS
9.1%

Financial Services

FLQL
9.6%
PBUS
11.4%

Industrials

FLQL
9.0%
PBUS
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLQL
8.9%
PBUS
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLQL
3.4%
PBUS
4.5%

Real Estate

FLQL
2.7%
PBUS
1.8%

Energy

FLQL
2.6%
PBUS
3.1%

Utilities

FLQL
2.0%
PBUS
2.2%

Basic Materials

FLQL
1.7%
PBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLQL vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLQL
FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLQL vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLQLPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.54

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

10.67

+1.19

FLQL vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLQLPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-33.15%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-9.02%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-19.07%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-25.40%

+3.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-5.07%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.15%

-0.12%

Volatility

FLQL vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 3.86%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLQLPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.86%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

10.36%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.09%

13.05%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

17.18%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

19.26%

-1.77%

FLQL vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLQL vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, which matches PBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
1.02%1.10%1.13%1.50%2.07%1.81%1.99%1.78%1.82%1.22%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.01%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FLQL and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLQL has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PBUS (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 13.76% vs 12.59% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.

FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 1.01% for PBUS.

FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.04% for PBUS.

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLQL and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer