FLQL vs. PBUS
FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FLQL tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index while PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLQL returned 14.70%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for PBUS. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBUS.
Performance
FLQL vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly higher than PBUS's 10.82% return.
FLQL
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PBUS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FLQL vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 12.66% | 19.64% | 24.33% | 23.58% | -14.83% | 26.58% | 10.67% | 29.09% | -2.79% | 9.63% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 10.82% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLQL and PBUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FLQL and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLQL vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLQL
PBUS
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
FLQL
PBUS
Communication Services
FLQL
PBUS
Consumer Cyclical
FLQL
PBUS
Healthcare
FLQL
PBUS
Industrials
FLQL
PBUS
Financial Services
FLQL
PBUS
Consumer Defensive
FLQL
PBUS
Real Estate
FLQL
PBUS
Basic Materials
FLQL
PBUS
Utilities
FLQL
PBUS
Energy
FLQL
PBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLQL vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank
FLQL
PBUS
FLQL vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLQL | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.08 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 13.93 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLQL | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.30 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.80 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
FLQL vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and PBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLQL | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -33.15% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -9.02% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.32% | -19.07% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -25.40% | +3.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.64% | +0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -5.13% | +1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.99% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FLQL vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) at 2.94%. This indicates that FLQL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLQL | PBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.94% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 9.13% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 12.06% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 17.05% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 19.33% | -1.83% |
FLQL vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLQL vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison
FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than PBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.13% | 1.50% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 1.99% | 1.78% | 1.82% | 1.22% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.98% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FLQL and PBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLQL has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PBUS (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLQL dropped -33.64% vs PBUS's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, FLQL leads with 14.70% vs 13.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLQL has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 13.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLQL.
FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for PBUS.
FLQL tracks LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, while PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.04% for PBUS.
FLQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLQL and PBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer