PBUS vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 12.60%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for XLG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

PBUS vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBUS achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 1.60% return.

PBUS

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 7.04%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 20.88%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 21.35%
• 5Y*: 14.28%
• 10Y*: 16.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBUS vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	8.10%	17.58%	24.99%	27.33%	-19.64%	26.77%	21.75%	31.60%	-4.77%	7.13%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	1.60%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	7.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and XLG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017	0.86

The correlation between PBUS and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PBUS vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBUS	XLG
Technology	38.9%	46.8%
Financial Services	10.9%	9.0%
Communication Services	10.7%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	11.2%
Healthcare	8.4%	7.0%
Industrials	8.1%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	5.2%
Energy	3.2%	2.4%
Utilities	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	0.6%

Return for Risk

PBUS vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBUS

PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 58
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 39
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBUS vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBUS	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.44	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.98	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	1.61	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	5.77	+5.54

PBUS vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBUS	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-52.39%	+19.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-12.41%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	-20.70%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-28.02%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-6.91%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.11%	-7.63%	+2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	3.46%	-1.40%

Volatility

PBUS vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 5.01% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBUS	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	5.04%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.10%	10.74%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	13.98%	-1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	18.79%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.34%	18.88%	+0.46%

PBUS vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PBUS vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	1.04%	1.05%	1.20%	1.36%	1.71%	0.98%	1.35%	1.53%	2.33%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.66%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBUS and XLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PBUS and XLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PBUS or XLG?

XLG has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PBUS (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, PBUS or XLG?

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 14.28% vs 12.60% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBUS or XLG?

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 14.28% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBUS or XLG?

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBUS or XLG?

PBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.

What is the main difference between PBUS and XLG?

PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.