PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PBUS vs. VV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PBUS vs. VV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PBUS having a 11.54% return and VV slightly lower at 11.49%.


PBUS

1D
0.18%
1M
5.47%
YTD
11.54%
6M
11.77%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
22.88%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*

VV

1D
0.18%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.49%
6M
11.76%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
22.98%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBUS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
11.54%17.58%24.99%27.33%-19.64%26.77%21.75%31.60%-4.77%7.13%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
11.49%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and VV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017

0.89

The correlation between PBUS and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBUS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PBUS
VV

Technology

35.4%
35.9%

Financial Services

11.6%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

PBUS
35.4%
VV
35.9%

Financial Services

PBUS
11.6%
VV
11.8%

Communication Services

PBUS
11.3%
VV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PBUS
10.1%
VV
9.8%

Healthcare

PBUS
8.6%
VV
8.6%

Industrials

PBUS
8.6%
VV
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

PBUS
4.8%
VV
4.8%

Energy

PBUS
3.6%
VV
3.6%

Utilities

PBUS
2.3%
VV
2.7%

Real Estate

PBUS
1.9%
VV
1.7%

Basic Materials

PBUS
1.8%
VV
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PBUS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBUS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PBUSVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

2.46

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

3.35

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

3.28

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.05

15.05

0.00

PBUS vs. VV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VV Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and VV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PBUSVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.46

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.81

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.60

+0.20

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and VV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PBUSVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-54.81%

+21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-9.21%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-18.97%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-25.66%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-6.84%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.01%

-0.02%

Volatility

PBUS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.72%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PBUSVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.72%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

8.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

11.98%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

17.22%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

18.20%

+1.14%

PBUS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PBUS and VV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PBUS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, which matches VV's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
0.97%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%0.00%0.00%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.97%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PBUS and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PBUS has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to VV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs VV's -54.81%.

On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.92% vs 13.84% for PBUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS and VV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

PBUS and VV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.97%.

PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PBUS and VV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer