PBUS vs. VV
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index while VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 13.84%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
PBUS vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PBUS having a 11.54% return and VV slightly lower at 11.49%.
PBUS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 11.77%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.88%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 29.28%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
PBUS vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 11.54% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 11.49% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and VV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PBUS and VV shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PBUS vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
VV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
VV
Financial Services
PBUS
VV
Communication Services
PBUS
VV
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
VV
Healthcare
PBUS
VV
Industrials
PBUS
VV
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
VV
Energy
PBUS
VV
Utilities
PBUS
VV
Real Estate
PBUS
VV
Basic Materials
PBUS
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
VV
PBUS vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PBUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 2.46 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.32 | 3.35 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.28 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 15.05 | 0.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PBUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.60 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -54.81% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -9.21% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -18.97% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -25.66% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -6.84% | +1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 2.01% | -0.02% |
Volatility
PBUS vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.72%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 8.96% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 11.98% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.22% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 18.20% | +1.14% |
PBUS vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PBUS and VV have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBUS vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, which matches VV's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 0.97% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.97% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, PBUS and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PBUS has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to VV (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 5-year performance, VV leads with 13.92% vs 13.84% for PBUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VV has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBUS and VV have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
PBUS and VV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.97%.
PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer